|
1325
PeaceWomen E-News
Issue
#71
29 November 2005
OCTOBER 2005: 5th anniversary recap & follow-up
(part two)
The
Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1325 on women, peace
and security, 31 October 2000. CLICK
HERE for the full text of the resolution.
To receive the 1325 PeaceWomen E-Newsletter, send an email to 1325news@peacewomen.org
with "subscribe" as the subject heading.
For past issues of the newsletter, CLICK
HERE.
THIS ISSUE OF 1325 PEACEWOMEN E-NEWS FEATURES:
1. Fifth Anniversary Recap & Follow-Up
(Part One): Analysis of Open Debate Themes & the
UN System-Wide Action Plan
2. Women, Peace and Security News
3. Feature Initiatives: 16
Days of Activism Against Gender Violence & White Ribbon Campaign
4. Feature Statements: WILPF
Statement on the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence
5. Feature Resource: “Cycles
of violence: gender relations and armed conflict” El-Bushra
& Sahl, I.M.G./ Agency for Co-operation and Research in Development
(Acord) (2005)
6. UNIFEM Update: A new publication:
“Securing the Peace” and Kigali workshop on “Strengthening
Demobilization and Reintegration Programmes by Taking a Gender Perspective.”
7. Women, Peace and Security Calendar
The PeaceWomen is a project of the Women's International
League for Peace and Freedom. Please visit us at http://www.peacewomen.org.
| 1.
FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF RESOLUTION 13252: RECAP & FOLLOW-up
(PART two) |
This is the second part of our two-part “Recap & Follow-Up”
of the 5th Anniversary of Resolution 1325. In our first part we
highlighted a number of events that took place and publications
that were released to mark this anniversary. Here we take a closer
look at the Security Council Open Debate and the UN System-Wide
Action Plans.
We continue to welcome any feedback, information, analysis and comment
on the 5th Anniversary. This can be sent to: enewsresponse@peacewomen.org
with “Recap & Follow-Up in the subject line.
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
ANALYSIS: UN SECURITY COUNCIL OPEN DEBATE
ON WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY
The PeaceWomen Team
As mentioned in “Part One”, this Open Debate held on
27 October 2005 saw the participation of all 15 members of the Security
Council, 26 Member States, 3 UN Agencies and 2 intergovernmental
bodies and two civil society speakers. The civil society speakers
were Hélène Dandi Lou (President of Vision and Action
of African Women Against Wars, Côte d’Ivoire) and Sweeta
Noori (Country Director - Women for Women International Afghanistan).
The focus of the Open Debate, organized by the Permanent Mission
of Romania (which held the presidency of the Security Council for
the month of October) was on the participation of women in peace-making
and peace building processes.
Supporting and promoting a broad and co-ordinated strategic approach
to the implementation of SCR 1325, the NGO Working Group on Women,
Peace and Security, in the lead up to the Open Debate, encouraged
Member States also to consider addressing a number of critical areas
for implementation beyond the focus of women’s participation
in peace-making and peacebuilding processes. These included, inter
alia, the establishment of a focal point and expert level working
group within the Security Council to ensure the integration of the
resolution in its work; the articulation of the relationship of
the proposed Peacebuilding Commission to civil society organizations,
including women’s organizations, in the mandate of the Commission;
the provision by the Secretary General in 2006 of recommendations
on systematic information provision and accountability measures
in relation to the use of gender-based violence by parties to armed
conflict; commitment to the development of national action plans
for the implementation of SCR 1325; and the UN System-wide action
plan and its monitoring and review.
For the NGO Working Group’s letter to Member States click
here
The detailed recommendations of the
NGO Working Group can be found on page 101 of its report “From
Local to Global – Making Peace Work for Women: NGO Working
Group on Women, Peace and Security - Five Years On Report.”
For the full report CLICK
HERE
In this analysis the PeaceWomen team seeks to highlight the manner
and extent to which the Member States in the Open Debate dealt with
the overall theme of the debate as well as some of the thematic
areas reflected in the NGO Working Group’s recommendations.
The overarching and crucial issue of the UN System-Wide Action Plan
is dealt with in a separate analysis below.
Establishment of a Security Council Mechanism
“Today, my country, Côte d’Ivoire, remains
divided. The social climate is characterized by a crisis of confidence
and visceral hatred…there are thousands of women who have
been raped since 2002. They live alone, completely bereft, and until
now have not received any medical, psychological or material assistance.
In spite of it all, resolution 1633 (2005) on the Côte d’Ivoire,
adopted by the Security Council on 21 October 2005, does not mention
the role of women, nor does it even consider gender. I would like
to know why not.” Helene Dandi-Lou, Côte d’Ivoire
A particular recommendation of the NGO Working
Group is that the Security Council establishes “a working
group on women, peace and security in order to fully mainstream
a gender perspective into all other relevant Security Council resolutions
and to include gender perspectives in the mandates of all UN peacekeeping
missions.”
The idea of a Security Council mechanism is not a new one and, as
noted in our review of last year’s debate, it was first raised
in 2002 and has been reiterated in Open Debates since that time.
Not as many Member States mentioned this mechanism in this year’s
debate, but some made clear reference to the establishment of a
“focal point” and a “working group.” Some
statements (Fiji and Sri Lanka), at least tacitly, linked these
proposed Security Council mechanisms to broader developments in
implementation by the UN System. The Human Security Network (a cross-regional
group of 14 countries, which includes Austria, Canada, Chile, Costa
Rica, Greece, Ireland, Jordan, Mali, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia,
Switzerland, Thailand, and South Africa as an observer), on whose
behalf Canada addressed the Council seemed to follow this approach.
It was supportive of the Secretary General’s recommendation
(paragraph 25(f) of the SG’s Report) that there be the appointment
of “a focal point or a group of focal points at high levels
to monitor the progress of implementation of Resolution 1325 within
the UN System.” It then went on to say that:
“in addition ….the members of the Network call on the
Security Council to strongly consider establishing a mechanism to
monitor its own actions in integration Resolution 1325, and other
related Resolutions, into its daily work through a focal point or
expert level working group…..Members of the Network urge the
Security Council to systematically incorporate gender considerations
in all aspects of mission planning and execution, particularly from
the outset.”
It seems correct that the establishment of focal points at high
levels within UN entities be carried through to the Security Council.
The timeliness of establishing such mechanisms, in light of the
release of the system-wide action plan, was also emphasized by others
and Fiji was particularly clear on this, stating that: “For
five years, the Security Council has been seized with the issue
on "Women, Peace and Security" and now that we have an
Action Plan, we ought to move forward and establish a focal point
and an expert level working group to ensure the integration of resolution
1325 in the Council's work.”
While the Security Council Presidential Statement does make a commitment
to integrate gender perspectives “into the terms of reference
of Security Council visits and missions and to include gender specialists
in its teams wherever possible,” it makes no mention of any
formal mechanism to ensure that this is the case. It would seem
that to make real France’s idea to have what it, in its statement,
termed “the ‘1325 reflex’ in the Council's day-to-day
work” steps need to be taken to establish a formal mechanism
within the Council – a working group on women, peace and security
would ensure that this “1325 reflex” is proactive rather
than reactive.
For extracts from the Open Debate on this theme
click here
Back to Top
• • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • •
National Level Implementation
In last year’s Open Debate, the Council in its Presidential
Statement made specific reference to national level implementation
welcoming the efforts of Member States “including the development
of national action plans, and [encouraging] Member States to continue
to pursue such implementation.” The endorsement of national
level implementation seen in last year’s Open Debate continued
this year and was reiterated in this year’s Presidential Statement
but there were, again, minimal explicit references by Member States
to their own action plans. There were a number of references to
laws or isolated initiatives but such examples do not indicate significant
progress on developing comprehensive women, peace and security strategies
on a national level.
Just as the implementation of SCR 1325 at the UN level needs to
take place strategically and in a co-ordinated fashion, so too on
a national level. As the United Kingdom (on behalf of the European
Union) noted, “Member States need to take responsibility for
the success of SCR 1325 and ensure that it is integrated into their
national policies and training programmes if there is to be real
progress.” Denmark, Canada and Sweden also emphasized the
importance of national action plans and Denmark, in particular,
encouraged fellow members of the Security Council to lead by example
on this issue. Each of these Member States has done work on a focused
national action plan and there was reporting on progress in this
regard:
Denmark
“As member states, we also have an obligation to implement
the resolution in the best and most effective way. In June the Danish
government launched a National Action Plan for implementation of
Security Council Resolution 1325. It is a firm Danish commitment
to implement all elements of 1325. The Action Plan is a result of
fruitful cooperation between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and
the Ministry of Defense in Denmark. It outlines a series of political
and operational actions engaging foreign, defense and development
cooperation policies. Each of equal importance for the full implementation
of the recommendations in 1325.”
Sweden
“[A]n interministerial working group is now finalizing a Swedish
Action Plan to intensify our implementation of SCR 1325. Work is
- and will be - carried out in co-operation with government agencies,
as well as with civil society. We look forward to sharing good practices
with states and organisations in the process of developing or implementing
their plans, methods and tools.”
Other Member States, such as France and the Philippines, highlighted
alternative approaches whilst still taking a broad approach to incorporating
policy on women, peace and security at a national level:
France
“Some States have already taken the initiative for national
action plans. I suggest the launch of regional action plans, on
the European Union model. France for its part has developed a national
plan of action for gender equality : "la Charte pour I'égalité".
Resolution 1325 is one aspect of it. We pledge to turn the implementation
of resolution 1325 into a specific and detailed chapter for action
by the Government when the Charter is updated in 2007.”
Philippines
“In short, the fundamental strategy of the Philippines for
pursuing resolution 1325 lies in enabling more women to systematically
participate in conflict prevention, management, resolution and post
conflict peacebuilding, while at the same time, rehabilitating their
communities and ensuring basic services and livelihood.”
While there is no set formula for integrating SCR 1325 at a national
level, the NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security have identified
certain key components and strategies based on an analysis of the
experiences of States that have already begun developing National
Action Plans (for these see Chapter 2 of the 5 Years On Report mentioned
above).
For extracts from the Open Debate on this
theme click
here
• • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • •
Women’s participation: Peace-making, peace-building
& the Peacebuilding Commission
“We urge that the Security Council and the international
organizations such as UNIFEM to support Afghan authorities and women's
groups in the peace-building in Afghanistan. We should have a full
partnership that develops the capacity of women and protects their
human rights.” Sweeta Noori, Afghanistan
Women’s participation in peace-making and peace building,
an important aspect of SCR 1325 was, as mentioned above, the focal
theme of the debate. There was significant comment on this by Member
States and overwhelming support for ensuring women’s involvement
in both formal and informal peace processes. The importance of participation
for ensuring lasting and secure peace and for ensuring “women’s
needs” are taken into account was acknowledged by many. Austria
noted, in particular, the positive effect for participation in the
long-term of ensuring participation in peace processes: “a
determined policy of the international community in the immediate
post-conflict phase in favor of women's participation, inter alia
by ensuring that post-conflict legislation gives them a right to
participate, can increase the long-term participation of women in
political processes in their countries.”
While the general statements of support are welcome, more significant
are the concrete suggestions by Member States to ensure that women’s
participation becomes real and effective. Some of these suggestions
were made in relation to peace-making and peace-building broadly
speaking. Others were directly linked to the proposed Peacebuilding
Commission and Member States’ support of this body partnering
with civil society, and in particular women’s organizations,
in the fulfillment of its mandate.
Measures to ensure the appointment of women to positions in which
they could participate in peace processes, was something raised
by a number of Member States. Here the need for the appointment
of women as Special Representatives and Special Envoys was highlighted
(by Austria, Sweden, Lichtenstein and Brazil). Linked to this was
the need to identify women candidates to fulfill relevant positions
(Brazil, Canada, Namibia (for SADC), Italy and Lichtenstein) with
Lichtenstein inviting “all interested States and NGOs to join
forces in gathering the necessary information to make the appointment
of women to such posts not only a high priority but a recurring
reality.” The invitation to Member States to provide the Secretary-General
with candidates to serve as Special Representatives was extended
in the Presidential Statement (which also urged the Secretary-General
to proceed with the appointment of a gender adviser within the Department
of Political Affairs.) Namibia (for SADC) also noted the need for
such deliberate efforts: “[t]he inadequate representation
of women in decision-making is not a phenomenon experienced in peace
building processes alone, but rather is extended to all other areas.
In this regard, we urge the UN system organizations, within their
respective mandates and Member States to address the barriers faced
by women to move up to decision-making positions.” A further
aspect given some mention was the need for the provision of firm
guidelines to enhance participation.
Support of the Peace-Building Commission as a vehicle for ensuring
women’s participation was reflected in most statements, including
the Presidential Statement. Although this support was there on a
general level, disappointingly only a few states acknowledged the
importance of formalizing a mechanism for consultation within the
mandate of the Commission:
United Kingdom (on behalf of EU)
The EU believes that the Peacebuilding Commission should, as part
of its mandate, ensure that women and women's groups are represented
in peace processes, thus enabling them to play an essential role.
Austria
The creation of a Peacebuilding Commission provides us with a unique
opportunity to ensure the involvement of women in UN-led peacebuilding
processes. The Peacebuilding Commission should ensure, as parts
of its mandate, that women and women’s groups are represented
in peace processes, thus enabling them to play a meaningful role.
Liechtenstein
[W]e are also of the view that the mandate of the Peace-Building
Commission should explicitly commit to partnering with civil society,
including women's organizations, through format mechanisms at headquarters
and at the country level. This would go a long way towards ensuring
that women's needs, priorities and roles in peace processes are
duly taken into account in the Peace-Building Commission's activities
and programs.
Kenya
Today, with the steady, and sure evolution in the establishment
of a Peace-Building Commission, the role of women in initiating,
nurturing and entrenching post-conflict peace-building, is a given.
In our own remarks during recent informal consultations, Kenya stressed
the need to incorporate early, this important element within formal
architecture of the Peace-Building Commission.
Germany
We consider the decision to establish a Peace Building Commission
as one of the greatest achievements of the summit. It is of vital
importance that a gender perspective is integrated in the Peacebuilding
Commission and that this perspective should be reflected in the
mandate of the Commission as well as in its structure. The Outcome
Document stresses tie importance of inclusion of civil society in
country-specific meetings. Germany believes that the inclusion of
women's organizations will be of particular importance
Both Austria and Norway expressed support for the inclusion of a
Gender Advisor in the Peacebuilding Support Office in order to ensure
the integration of a gender perspective in the work of the Commission.
Further specific ideas on integrating a gender perspective in the
design and work of the Peace Building Commission are reflected in
the letter to the Secretary General and the President of the General
Assembly by 14 women foreign ministers.
This letter was featured in Issue 68 of 1325 PeaceWomen E-News and
a copy is available HERE
For extracts from the Open Debate on Women's Participation in Peace
Processes Click
here
For extracts from the Open Debate on Women and the Peacebuilding
Commission Click
here
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
Gender-Based Violence
One of the recommendations of the NGO Working Group on Women, Peace
and Security was that the Security Council request the Secretary
General to consider and report on ideas to the Security Council
(by October 2006) on:
• Different means by which the Security Council could be more
systematically informed of the use of gender-based violence by parties
to armed conflict, paying special attention to the mechanism already
developed to monitor and report to the Security Council on violations
against children in armed conflict,
• Different means by which the Security Council could do more
to hold parties to armed conflict accountable for these violations
by considering, for example, the imposition of targeted sanctions
against such parties.
This recommendation was, unfortunately, not taken up by the Security
Council in its Presidential Statement despite the fact that it,
and a number of Member States, explicitly condemned the use of sexual
and other forms of violence and called for an end to impunity. The
first aspect of the above recommendation, that of a systematic manner
of informing the Security Council of the use of gender-based violence
by parties to armed conflict, was barely taken up at all. It was
not reflected on any level in the Presidential Statement. There
was, however, an allusion by France to the usefulness of the new
Human Rights Council in this regard and a link drawn by the Philippines
to the system-wide action plan and its potential usefulness: “As
developments on the ground continue to be fluid, the Philippines
would like to see the action plan used also as a tool for gathering
accurate information on the status of women in conflict areas, including
the scope and gravity of gender-based violence and the progress
on the empowerment of women in the area of peace and security. Certainly,
this information would serve to guide the Council on the way forward
on implementation and monitoring.” If, as seems to be the
case, Member States feel strongly about condemning and addressing
the continuing use of gender-based violence by parties to armed
conflict it is hoped that there will be more concrete actions taken
to ensure it is something that the Security Council can deal with
effectively.
For extracts from the Open Debate on this theme CLICK
HERE
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
For the index to the Open Debate statements and to access the full
statements CLICK
HERE
For the Presidential Statement click
here
For index and links to the thematic compilation of statements developed
by the PeaceWomen Team CLICK
HERE
Back to Top
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
ANALYSIS: UN SYSTEM-WIDE ACTION PLAN FOR
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCR 1325
The PeaceWomen Team
On October 10 2005, the Secretary General released his report on
Women, Peace and Security, accompanied by a UN System-Wide Action
Plan on the implementation of SCR 1325. This Action Plan comes in
response to a request by the Security Council, in a Presidential
Statement adopted at the 2004 Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security,
calling on the Secretary-General to submit to the Council “…
an action plan, with time lines, for implementing resolution 1325
(2000) across the United Nation's system, with a view to strengthening
commitment and accountability at the highest levels, as well as
to allow for improved accountability, monitoring and reporting on
progress on implementation within the United Nations system.”
Since the adoption of SCR 1325 in 2000, the lack of a coordinated
strategy for the implementation of the resolution across the United
Nations system has been repeatedly cited as an impediment to the
effective realization of the goal of bringing gender perspectives
to the centre of all UN efforts in peace and security. While progress
in implementation has been made by various UN Agencies, civil society
groups and some member states have consistently highlighted the
gap in systematic planning, monitoring and reporting of measures
being taken to ensure full implementation of the resolution by all
UN entities and departments at headquarters and country level.
In that regard, the development of a System-wide Action Plan is
a definite step forward. The Plan was prepared by the Inter-Agency
Task Force on Women, Peace and Security, chaired by the Office of
the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and comprising representatives
from 22 UN system entities and observes from inter-governmental
organizations and civil society. It is envisioned as a basis on
which UN entities can formulate concrete strategies and ensure support
to member states in advancing the role of women in peace and security,
as well as strengthen system-wide accountability and co-operation.
The Plan is based on a matrix of recommendations taken from the
articles of SCR 1325 and subsequent Security Council Presidential
Statements on Women, Peace and Security, with various UN departments
and agencies providing information regarding their projected activities
related to these articles up to the end of 2007.
The NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security has long advocated
for the creation of this action plan, and had emphasized the importance,
in preparing the plan, of an extensive and dynamic consultation
process among different UN entities, with high-level involvement
to ensure a coordinated work-plan. Additionally, the effectiveness
of this Action Plan is greatly dependant on ensuring accountability
for its implementation, including concrete time lines, and an appropriate
mechanism to coordinate, monitor and report on progress in implementation.
In this regard the Plan recommends the coordination and monitoring
of system-wide implementation through the UN’s High Level
Committee on Programs while holding heads of entities and focal
points accountable for implementation at the UN entity level.
The 2005 Security Council Open debate on Women Peace and Security
concluded with a statement from the Council’s Romanian presidency,
endorsing the UN System-Wide Action Plan and requiring the Secretary
General to review its implementation on an annual basis, starting
in 2006. Additionally, the open debate provided an opportunity for
UN member states to comment on the System-Wide Action Plan. Below
is a cross-section of Member States’ comments:
Iceland
Iceland warmly welcomes the United Nations Action Plan for implementing
resolution 1325 across the United Nations system which has been
presented to the Security Council today. The System-Wide Action
Plan is an important tool for better coordination and building on
the synergies of the United Nations system. With adoption of the
Action Plan, the United Nations are creating a good precedent which
should encourage member states to mainstream gender perspective
in their own policies.
Kenya
At the inter-governmental level, I would appeal for closer co-ordination.
The idea of working through the High-Level Committee on Programmes
with participation of all concerned organizations and components
of the UN Secretariat, is a good one. Our experience in using a
system of lead agencies; to ensure dialogue as envisaged in the
report, has to be very carefully implemented. Institutional jealousies
arise that can hamper long-term gains for women. The same can be
said for co-ordination within the United Nations itself. Appointing
a group of focal points instead of one focal point may diminish
the institutional rivalry that so frequently manifests itself in
our work.....Kenya supports the recommendations by the Secretariat
to biennialize reporting on implementation of the Action Plan. This
can be interspersed with thematic reports which we agree will balance
the implementation and policy-making cycles and make for a more
rigorous implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000).
Liechtenstein
We commend the remarkable work undertaken by the 37 UN entities
which have contributed to the elaboration of the system-wide action
plan. The action plan provides a wealth of information on activities
being carried out for women in conflict and post-conflict situations.
This information should facilitate the review of the impact of resolution
1325. In order to make this possible, it will be necessary to provide
for interaction and consultation with civil society, in particular
women's non-governmental organizations. At the national level, such
interaction could form the basis of the establishment of action
plans for the implementation of the resolution, it would help raise
awareness of the need to promote the active participation of women
in the decision-making regarding all aspects of conflict prevention
and resolution as well as peace-building.
Namibia (for SADC)
The action plan has provided us with a framework by which progress
on the implementation of resolution 1325 can be coordinated, monitored
and evaluated. It is important that the action plan does not "reinvent
the wheel" but rather builds on the achievements already made.
In this regard, we welcome the recommendation to review the adequacy
of existing operational tools, guidelines and manuals for gender
mainstreaming.
Sri Lanka
[I]t is essential that the Security Council... request the Secretary
General to update, monitor and review the UN System-wide Action
Plan, on an annual basis.
Tanzania
We are encouraged by the adoption of a system-wide action plan on
the implementation of the resolution… Requisite resources,
both financial and human, need to be made available for the successful
implementation of the action plan.
For extracts from the Open Debate on this theme click
here
For the full report CLICK
HERE
Back to TOp
2.
WOMEN,
PEACE AND SECURITY NEWS |
THE
SELECT CLUB OF WOMEN IN POWER
November 22, 2005 - (Sapa-AFP) On becoming
Germany's new Chancellor on Tuesday, Angela Merkel joined a club
of women leaders whose members can still literally be counted on
the fingers of one hand. Along with Helen Clark of New Zealand,
Begum Khaleda Zia of Bangladesh, Luisa Diogo of Mozambique and Maria
do Carmo Silveira of tiny São Tome and Principe, all prime
ministers, Merkel is henceforth one of only five women worldwide
to head their country's government.
UN
CALLS FOR STRONG ACTION TO ELIMINATE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
November 25 , 2005 - (UN News Service) The
United Nations today marked the International Day for the Elimination
of Violence against Women with calls for states to take legal action
against the global scourge, for societies to change a mindset that
permits such abuse, and for women themselves to stand up and speak
out against a culture of shame.
AFGHANISTAN:
CALLS FOR AN END TO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
November 24, 2005 – (IRIN) Although the plight of Afghan women
has improved somewhat following the collapse of the hard line Taliban
regime in late 2001, acts of intimidation and violence against them
have continued unabated, with many women - particularly in rural
areas – believing that their situation remains unchanged.
UNHCR:
VIOLENCE AGAINST REFUGEE WOMEN IS A TOP PRIORITY
November 25, 2005 - (UNHCR) Violence is a common thread in the lives
of refugees and displaced people all over the world. War, torture
and persecution provide the grim background to their flight, while
displacement and exile often engender more violence. For women refugees,
the situation can be even worse than it is for men, and on Friday
UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said combating
violence against refugee women was one of his top priorities.
SOUTH
AFRICA: GUNS AND GENDER VIOLENCE – A LETHAL COMBINATION
November 16, 2005 - (IRIN) Victoria [not her real name] thought
she had the law on her side when she left her abusive partner and
successfully applied for a protection order against him. According
to provisions set out in South Africa's 1998 Domestic Violence Act
and reinforced by recently enacted firearms legislation, the order
gave the police powers to confiscate the gun that had repeatedly
been used to terrorise her.
For
more country-specific women, peace and security news, CLICK
HERE
For
more international women, peace and security news, CLICK
HERE
Back to Top
16 DAYS Of Activism Against Gender Violence
November 25 - December 10, 2005
"For the Health of Women, For the Health of the World:
No More Violence"
What is the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence
Campaign?
The 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence is an international
campaign originating from the first Women's Global Leadership Institute
sponsored by the Center for Women's Global Leadership in 1991. Participants
chose the dates, November 25, International Day Against Violence
Against Women and December 10, International Human Rights Day, in
order to symbolically link violence against women and human rights
and to emphasize that such violence is a violation of human rights.
This 16-day period also highlights other significant dates including
December 1, which is World AIDS Day, and December 6, which marks
the Anniversary of the Montreal Massacre.
The 16 Days Campaign has been used as an organizing strategy by
individuals and groups around the world to call for the elimination
of all forms of violence against women by:
∑ raising awareness about gender-based violence as a human
rights issue at the local, national, regional and international
levels
∑ strengthening local work around violence against women
∑ establishing a clear link between local and international
work to end violence against women
∑ providing a forum in which organizers can develop and share
new and effective strategies
∑ demonstrating the solidarity of women around the world organizing
against violence against women
∑ creating tools to pressure governments to implement promises
made to eliminate violence against women
Since 1991, approximately 1,700 organizations in 130 countries have
participated in the 16 Days Campaign!
Submit your materials!
Participants in the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence
Campaign have been instrumental in bringing issues of violence against
women to the forefront in local, national, regional and global arenas.
The strategies employed by groups and the activities organized during
the 16 Days Campaign period continue to be unique and innovative.
The Center for Women's Global Leadership asks that all participants
of the 16 Days Campaign - past as well as present participants -
send documentation of their events i.e. posters, pictures, t-shirts,
video footage, poems, songs, statements, reports, etc. to the Global
Center for the campaign archives (see contact information below).
If you have photographs, documents, or other examples of your work
that you can send in an electronic version, please do so and we
will post it on the website.
Join the 16 Days electronic discussion!
We invite you to join the 16 Days of Activism against Gender Violence
electronic discussion taking place in the form of a listserve. The
discussion allows activists to collaboratively develop themes and
strategies for the annual 16 Days of Activism against Gender Violence
Campaign. In addition, it can be used to discuss how groups are
raising awareness about gender-based violence as a human rights
issue at the local, national, regional and international levels,
to uncover and learn from the ways in which activists have strengthened
local work around violence against women, to continually resurface
the link between local and international work to end violence against
women, to share and develop new and effective strategies, to show
the solidarity of women around the world organizing against violence
against women, and to help develop further tools to pressure governments
to implement promises made to eliminate violence against women.
If you are interested in joining the discussion or if you have any
questions, please contact Sara Nordstrom at the Center for Women's
Global Leadership at cwgl@igc.org.
Join the 16 Days movement!
Become part of an already existing student, community, national
or international activity for the 16 Days or take actions on your
own. Submit your planned activity to us for posting to the International
Calendar of Campaign Activities and become part of the growing global
movement organizing during this time. Your submissions will also
enable the Center to refer other individuals and organizations that
are interested in your activities to you. Please send a description
of planned activities for the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender
Violence to the address below.
Center for Women's Global Leadership
160 Ryders Lane, Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8555, USA
Phone (1-732) 932-8782
Fax: (1-732) 932-1180
E-mail: cwgl@igc.org
For more on this initiative CLICK
HERE
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
White Ribbon Campaign– Men
Working To End Men’s Violence Against Women
In 1991, a handful of men in Canada decided to speak out against
violence against women. Wearing a white ribbon is a symbol of men's
opposition to men's violence against women. Wearing a white ribbon
is a personal pledge never to commit, condone nor remain silent
about violence against women. Each year, we urge men and boys to
wear a ribbon for one or two weeks, starting on November 25, the
International Day for the Eradication of Violence Against Women.
For more on the White Ribbon Campaign visit: http://www.whiteribbon.ca/
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
JOIN THE16 DAYS CYBER DIALOGUES 2005 IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
Justice in cyber space redraws colonial boundaries
Johannesburg 21 November: The Cyber Dialogues, piloted during last
year’s Sixteen Days of Activism on Gender Violence, are set
to redraw the map of Southern Africa through chat rooms in six languages
that cut across artificial colonial boundaries. Under the banner
“Making IT work for gender justice” the cyber dialogues
that start with a “taking stock” session on 24 November
are the culmination of training workshops around the region conducted
by Gender Links (GL) in partnership with the Gender and Media Southern
African (GEMSA) Network.
For more on this initiative click
here
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
Fact Sheet for Distribution: Adolescent
Girls Affected by Violent Conflict
Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, and the
Gender and Peacebuilding Working Group of the Canadian Peacebuilding
Coordinating Committee
November 25, 2005 - Today, on the International Day Against Violence
Against Women, we urge you to recognize the specific situations
of adolescent girls affected by violent conflict and to support
adolescent girls’ participation in conflict prevention, peacebuilding,
and community development. In armed conflict situations, adolescent
girls have distinctive experiences that are often different from
those of older women, younger children and adolescent boys. Yet,
adolescent girls tend to fall through the cracks of programming,
in part because they are not women, and not children. In producing
this fact sheet on Adolescent girls affected by violent conflict,
the Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, and
the Gender and Peacebuilding Working Group of the Canadian Peacebuilding
Coordinating Committee, urge you to recognize the roles and capacities
of adolescent girls and to give increased policy and program attention
to adolescent girls as a distinctive group. Doing so will help to
protect girls from violence and its effects, and foster their participation
in conflict prevention, peacebuilding, reconstruction and development
processes.
We ask that you distribute this fact sheet widely and post (wherever
possible) to your website.
Find the fact sheet at: http://www.peacewomen.org/campaigns/global/Adolescent_girls_E.pdf
Surendrini Wijeyaratne, on behalf of the Gender and Peacebuilding
Working Group
Working Group Coordinator, Canadian Peacebuilding Coordinating Committee
Comité coordinateur canadien pour la consolidation de la
paix
Ottawa, Ontario, CA.
Tel: (613) 241 - 3446
E-mail: surendrini@PEACEBUILD.CA
http://www.peacebuild.ca/
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
For more women, peace and security initiatives – in country,
regional, global and international, visit: http://www.peacewomen.org/campaigns/global/index.html
Back to Top
WILPF Statement on the 16
Days of Activism Against Gender Violence
November 2005
The 25th of November is the date of the International Day for the
Elimination of Violence Against Women. On that day the 15th annual
16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence start and continue until
the 10th of December, the United Nations International Human Rights’
day. The observance began at the first Feminist Eucuentro for Latin
America and the Caribbean held in Bogota, Colombia, in 1981. In
1999 the United Nations officially recognized the observance.
We are in the year of Beijing +10; 180 countries have now ratified
the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW); and, we have just celebrated the 5th anniversary
of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women,
Peace and Security.
All this indicates that women’s rights should be respected.
All over the world violence against women is nevertheless increasing
– in families, in society and most of all during war and armed
conflict.
Every day we get horrifying examples of that increase in violence:
∑ One out of three women have been beaten, sexually abused
or raped.
∑ Systematic rape, sexual violence and abuse documented in
Darfur, Sudan, is widespread.
∑ This year 314 women in El Salvador have been murdered.
∑ Every year 14,000 Russian women die as a result of violence
in the home.
∑ Every fifth day a Spanish woman is killed by her partner.
∑ Every fourth minute a woman in the USA is raped.
∑ In fourteen countries a man can get mitigation of his sentence
or impunity if he perpetrates violence or kills a woman in order
to protect the so-called honour.
∑ According to law in nine countries a rapist gets impunity
if he marries his victim.
Violence against women in war areas has, according to UNDP, reached
epidemic heights. The common denominator for the 1990’s conflicts
and the conflicts in this millennium has been comprehensive sexual
abuse, forced pregnancy as a tool in ethnic genocide, kidnapping,
intentional infection with HIV/AIDS and trafficking in women and
children for sexual purposes.
Change in the pattern of sex roles is one of the consequent conditions
in a country in conflict, war or under occupation. Violence and
aggression get integrated in everyday life. When killing becomes
legitimate, it also becomes legitimate to rape or buy and sell human
bodies, and a systematic brutalization of the whole society will
occur. The brutalization and the change in the pattern of sex roles
will constitute numerous and grave assaults on women who are abused
by family members as well as by unknown men, civilians as well as
soldiers.
In Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom we have
testimonies from women in many countries in war, crises or conflict.
And we know from them that women’s conditions have deteriorated
and their rights are under pressure. Furthermore, the militarization
of societies generates violence against all people; violence against
women is extensive and varied in its manifestation. Everywhere women
are working for respect of their rights and for better conditions.
Five years ago the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1325 on
Women, Peace and Security. Here the Council focused on the impact
of war and conflict on women’s and girls’ lives. Furthermore
it recognized that the contributions of women in negotiation processes
and decision making are underestimated and not utilized, and it
underlined that women ought to be recognized as active and full
parties.
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom calls on
all UN member states and all UN bodies to implement UN Security
Council Resolution 1325 as one of the means to act against gender
violence.
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
For further WILPF resolutions and statements please visit: http://www.wilpf.int.ch/statements/sindex.htm
Back to TOP
Cycles of violence: gender relations
and armed conflict
El-Bushra, J.; Sahl, I.M.G./ Agency for Co-operation and Research
in Development (Acord) (2005)
This book describes ACORD's research "Gender-sensitive design
and planning in conflict-affected situations", carried out
during 2000 and 2001 in five communities living in the shadow of
violent conflict in Juba (Sudan), Gulu (Uganda), Luanda (Angola),
Timbukta (Mali) and the Lower Shabelle region (Somalia). It also
includes analysis of data collected in Eritrea and Rwanda and addresses
the challenges in methodologies and tools for research in turbulent
environments. The authors examine the impact of war on gender relations
and whether gender relations contribute to conflict. The analysis
explores the term "gender relations" and unpacks it into
several sub- categories: gender "roles", "identities",
"ideologies", and "institutions/power structures,"
examining how each of these changes are as a result of war. The
authors find that, while gender is a factor in perpetuating violence,
it is also a factor in rebuilding social relations and peace.
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
For NGO and civil society reports, papers and statements, UN and
government reports, and books, journals and articles on women, peace
and security issues, please visit: http://www.peacewomen.org/resources/resourcesindex.html
Back to Top
New Publication: Securing the Peace
In celebration of the 5th Anniversary of Security Council Resolution
1325 and the creation of a new United Nations Peacebuilding Commission,
UNIFEM completed a new Peace and Security publication, “Securing
the Peace: Guiding the International Community towards Women’s
Effective Participation throughout Peace Processes.” This
publication highlights the importance of women’s involvement
at all stages of peace processes in order to ensure sustainable
long-term peace. The opportunities afforded in the transition from
war to peace open a window to address root causes of conflict and
to transform institutions, structures and relationships within society.
“Securing the Peace” provides concrete recommendations
to support women’s effective participation at all stages of
a peace process, promote gender-sensitive peace negotiations and
agreements, and encourage the mainstreaming of a gender perspective
throughout the implementation of peace accords.
An electronic version of the publication can be found at:
http://www.womenwarpeace.org/issues/peaceprocess/Securing_the_Peace.pdf
For more information on women’s participation in peace processes
please visit:
http://www.womenwarpeace.org/issues/peaceprocess/peace_process.htm
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
Kigali workshop on Strengthening Demobilization and Reintegration
Programmes by Taking a Gender Perspective.
Co-organized by UNIFEM and the Multi-Country Demobilization
and Reintegration Programme (MDRP)
From 31 October to 2 November 2005 UNIFEM and the World Bank-administered
Multi-Country Demobilization Programme (MDRP) Secretariat held a
consultation in Kigali, Rwanda. The consultation brought together
representatives from seven national demobilization and reintegration
commissions in the Great Lakes region, UN practitioners, experts,
NGO representatives and women ex-combatants. The group examined
how gender is currently being addressed by national programs and
special projects supported by the MDRP, and identified gaps and
areas to be strengthened. Participants concluded by formulating
principles and recommendations for applying a gender perspective
throughout the MDRP and associated DDR processes. The workshop began
on the fifth anniversary of resolution 1325, which calls on “all
those involved in planning of DDR to consider the different needs
of female and male ex-combatants and to take into account the needs
of their dependents.” One female ex-combatant participant
from Burundi remarked after the workshop: “I was happy to
meet with women ex-combatants from other countries. I was relieved
to see that my problems and aspirations were not peculiar to me.”
UNIFEM and the MDRP Secretariat have commissioned a report of the
workshop, which will be available in early 2006.
For more information on the workshop visit: http://www.unifem.org/news_events/story_detail.php?StoryID=355
For more information on women, gender and DDR and UNIFEM’s
response, visit:
www.womenwarpeace.org/issues/ddr.htm
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
UNIFEM’s Web Portal on Women, Peace and Security, CLICK
HERE
Back to TOp
7.
WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY CALENDAR |
Gender, Guns and Peace Processes
5 December 2005, Geneva, Switzerland
This meeting, convened by the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue as
part of the project “Negotiating Disarmament,” will
feature experts on gender, guns, and peace processes. Seeking to
contribute to the implementation of Resolution 1325 through knowledge
exchange and debate, a small group of advocates, analysts and practitioners
from several disciplines will discuss the influence, relevance and
impact of gender on the negotiation of disarmament, as well as weapons
control issues in peace processes and in the implementation of peace
agreements.
For more information email Cate Buchanan at cateb@hdcentre.org
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
Better Offices: A Panel Discussion on Bolstering U.N. Peacemaking
30 November, 3:30-5:30 pm, UN Department of Political Affairs, UN
Headquarters NY, Dag Hammerskjold Auditorium
In keeping with the decisions of the 2005 World Summit, the Department
of Political Affairs is advancing proposals to bolster the ability
of the Secretary-General to bring his “good offices”
to bear in preventing and resolving deadly conflicts around the
world. The Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Ibrahim
Gambari, will lead a panel discussion on this subject, joined by
three veteran U.N. peace envoys.
Speakers will include:
∑ Ibrahim A. Gambari, Under-Secretary-General for Political
Affairs
∑ Lakhdar Brahimi, Special Advisor to the Secretary General
∑ Alvaro de Soto, United Nations Special Coordinator for the
Middle East Peace Process
∑ Ibrahima Fall, Special Representative of the Secretary-General
for the Great Lakes Region
U.N. Staff, delegations of Member States, UN-affiliated non-governmental
organizations and media representatives are welcome to attend.
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
Developing Communities: Practicing Theater for Transformation
9 - 11 December, 2005, The Grail Women's Inst. for Social Transformation,
The Grail in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
The Grail Women's Institute for Social Transformation invites you
to a new, exciting and energizing workshop where passion for social
justice meets the arts: A workshop for women who are social activists,
union organizers, teachers, faith-based workers, artists and performers,
community builders, concerned citizens--any woman committed to creating
a world of justice and peace.
Deadline for registration 2 December 2005.
To register please contact Simonetta Romano at: sromano.poped@grail-us.org
or call (845) 534-2031
For more information please on this event, visit: http://www.peacewomen.org/frame/calendar/transformative_theater.html
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
•
For the complete calendar, CLICK
HERE.
Back to Top
The
PeaceWomen is a project of the Women's
International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF).
Previous issues of 1325 PeaceWomen E-News can be found at: http://www.peacewomen.org/news/1325News/1325ENewsindex.html.
At this time 1325 PeaceWomen E-News is only available in English.
The PeaceWomen Team hopes to translate the newsletter into French
and Spanish in the future. If you would not like to receive the
English newsletter but would like to be placed on a list when translation
is possible, please write to: 1325news@peacewomen.org.
To unsubscribe from the 1325 PeaceWomen News, send an email to 1325news@peacewomen.org
with "unsubscribe" as the subject heading.
Questions, concerns and comments can be sent to 1325news@peacewomen.org.
1325 E-News and other submissions should be directed to 1325news@peacewomen.org.
If you would like to fill out the 1325 PeaceWomen
E-News evaluation form in either English or French, please write
to 1325news@peacewomen.org
and we will send you the questionnaire by email.
Back to Top
|