|
Outcry Over ICC’s Scrapping
of Rape Charges
Victims of sexual violence in DRC angered by court’s controversial
move.
By Jacques Kahorha in Goma
June 3, 2008 - (IWPR) Congolese women who’ve
fallen victim to rape and related crimes say they feel badly let
down by the decision of the International Criminal Court, ICC, to
drop all sexual violence charges relating to the conflict in the
Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC.
The ICC decision followed an internal squabble over witness protection,
which was reported by IWPR last week. Charges of sexual slavery
were removed from the indictments against militia leaders Germain
Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo, who face a confirmation of charges
hearing late this month in The Hague.
Four DRC militiamen have so far been indicted by the ICC on charges
of playing a leading role in inter-ethnic violence in the Ituri
region, where rape has been widely used as a weapon of war, but
only Katanga and Ngudjolo were facing counts of sexual violence.
The sexual slavery charges against Katanga and Ngudjolo had been
welcomed by human rights groups, who also hailed prosecutors' plans
to add counts of rape. Activists are now angry that these alleged
crimes have been dropped from the indictments.
In DRC, lawyers, women’s organisations and rape survivors
in the troubled North Kivu province – which has also experienced
a horrific wave of sexual violence – say the feel betrayed
by the court.
“If the ICC does not take into account the crimes related
to sexual violence, this [suggests] that perpetrators arrested all
over the country should be released,” said attorney Mireille
Amani Kahatwa of the American Bar Association in Goma.
According to a United Nations report, North Kivu recorded 7,291
instances of rape in 2006 and 2007, with more than 30 per cent of
the victims being children and teenagers.
The sexual violence is committed mainly by militia members, but
also reportedly by the Congolese national army, police and local
officials.
“This is a pitiful decision [by the ICC],” said a 27-year-old
rape victim who was interviewed in a hospital in Goma set up by
the NGO HEAL Africa, which focuses primarily on victims of sexual
violence.
“It shows that our suffering has no more consideration at
the international level [and] our situation cannot be taken into
account at that [court].”
In 2006, the DRC’s national assembly adopted a law on sexual
violence which makes prosecution of the crime a priority and requires
cases to be processed within three months. Despite the law, little
has changed, say advocates.
“If the Ituri leaders are not charged, the warlords of Kivu
will [also get away with] those crimes,” said Esperance Nvano
of the NGO Action Sante Femme, ASAF.
Others agreed.
“The ICC was our last hope because a law on sexual violence
voted in our country in 2006 is hardly implemented. Perpetrators
are arrested and, some days after, they are released,” said
a survivors’ representative at HEAL Africa.
According to victims, the ICC appears to have ignored the seriousness
of the crimes.
“If it knew the situation we [have], it could not take such
a decision,” said a 21-year-old girl from Ziralo, an area
about 150 kilometres north of Bukavu.
“I was in the field. Six men wearing torn military clothes,
armed with knives and guns, raped me,” said the girl. “They
damaged [me]. I was taken [for treatment], have had seven unsuccessful
operations already … and I am waiting for the 8th intervention.”
“How can this situation be ignored?” asked a rape victim
in her 30s from a village in the Masisi area, about 100 km west
of Goma. “I’m ready to be a witness. I have already
lost my mind. My life has become meaningless. I have nothing to
protect anymore.”
The woman also experienced a terrible ordeal at the hands of a militia.
“A group of nyamaswa [wild animals] took me out of my house
and raped me. Another group closed my husband and my four children
in the house and burned them. I saw them burning. I suffered a lot.
I threw myself hopelessly in the fire like a mad [person] to try
to rescue them,” she said.
“It is as if the ICC doesn’t really have a good understanding
[of] what sexual violence represents for our region,” added
Nvano of ASAF.
“All the 7000 raped women of our province have become dependants
and a burden for the community,” explained a HEAL Africa representative.
“They have no [desire] to work. They also need people to look
after them. Most of them cannot give birth anymore.”
“We need explanations from the ICC on the motivation [for
their] decision,” said Veronique Matunda, secretary of the
Provincial Commission for the Fight Against Sexual Violence.
If the charges are not prosecuted by the ICC, said Matunda, it will
only undermine local efforts to thwart the rising tide of sexual
violence.
Kahatwa says the court’s decision also threatens to undo all
the progress that has been achieved in persuading victims to testify
against their alleged abusers, which initially was quite a challenge.
“Most of them were at first fearful of attending [court to
testify]. We asked them to [overcome] their fears. Today, it is
no longer a problem,” he said.
Matunda, however, said she and other advocates are still hoping
that the ICC will change its mind.
“If the ICC ignores the crimes related to sexual violence,
we will mobilise women in the province to demonstrate. We will also
advocate at the national and the international community.
“Everybody has the right to justice. The ICC should offer
protection for the survivors. This can contribute to their healing
and discourage the practice of sexual violence in our region.”
From:http://www.iwpr.net/?p=acr&s=f&o=344977&apc_state=henh
|