|
RESOLUTION 1325
Full text
History & Analysis
Who's Responsible for Implementation?
1325
Anniversary
TRANSLATING
1325
UNITED
NATIONS
Women
and the UN
Security Council (SC)
Gender & Peacekeeping
1325 Monitor: Women &
Gender in the work of the Security Council
Gender Focal Points
PeaceBuilding Commission
WOMEN, WAR &
PEACE WEB PORTAL
UNIFEM
PeaceWomen
JOIN WILPF

|
|
Burma : INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS
DENOUNCE ATTEMPT BY MYANMAR REGIME TO GIVE THEMSELVES IMMUNITY FROM
CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND RENEW CALL FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
April 14, 2008 – (Global Justice Center)
The Myanmar regime, guilty of the most serious crimes of concern
to the international community, has revealed that it is seeking
to give itself constitutional immunity from prosecution for those
crimes. The Burma Lawyers' Council, the Global Justice Center and
the Burma Justice Committee denounce this attempt by the regime
to avoid accountability. The recently distributed final version
of the Constitution being put to a "referendum" on May
10th, 2008 now includes in Chapter XIV "Transitory Provisions,"
Article No. 445, stating, "No legal action shall be taken against
those (either individuals or groups who are members of SLORC and
SPDC) who officially carried out their duties according to their
responsibilities." This immunity is invalid under international
law and cannot be accepted by the international community.
There is ample evidence that the military regime has committed war
crimes, crimes against humanity and potentially even genocide through
forced relocation, torture, rape, enforced disappearances and extermination.
Perpetrators of these, the most serious of crimes, are not eligible
for amnesty under international law. Moreover, the global community
has a commitment under the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, Security
Council Resolution 1325 on women, peace and security and Resolution
1674 on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, to hold the
regime accountable for the crimes committed against the people of
Burma. In seeking an amnesty, the military regime recognizes that
it has committed serious crimes and needs amnesty for what it has
done and is doing. The regime cannot, however, simply give itself
immunity as it is seeking to do.
The constitutional amnesty is another example of how the regime
abuses the law as it seeks to solidify the military's rule of oppression
through a façade of legality. As stated by U Aung Htoo, Secretary
General of the Burma Lawyers' Council "Rule of law must replace
military might. This Constitution and its illegal amnesty provision
cannot bring sustainable peace to Burma."
The Burma Lawyers' Council, Global Justice Center and Burma Justice
Committee therefore today make clear:
1. The military regime must immediately desist from committing further
crimes against the people of Burma;
2. The military regime's constitutional process and intended amnesty
fails to comply with any of the applicable international legal norms
and will not have any force as a matter of law either internationally
or for the future within Burma; and
3. As a matter of international law, the U.N. Security Council should
create an Independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate the crimes
and pursue criminal accountability of those members of the military
regime who have committed international crimes.
From:www.globaljusticecenter.net
|
|
NEWS
1325
PeaceWomen E-News
Country News Index
International News
Peacekeeping News
RESOURCES
Country
& Thematic
Civil Society, UN & Government
1325
Advocacy Tools
INITIATIVES
In-country
Regional and Global
1325 in Action
ORGANIZATIONS
Country-specific
International
LATEST
PEACEWOMEN UPDATES
PEACEWOMEN
NGO WEB RING
Women, Peace &
Security Community representing the diversity and depth of research, organizing
and advocacy on women, peace and security issues.
|