PeaceWomen                              
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
HOME-------------CALENDAR-------------ABOUT US-------------CONTACT US

RESOLUTION 1325
Full text
History & Analysis
Who's Responsible for   Implementation?
1325 Anniversary


TRANSLATING 1325


UNITED NATIONS
Women and the UN
Security Council (SC)
Gender & Peacekeeping
1325 Monitor: Women &   Gender in the work of the   Security Council
Gender Focal Points
PeaceBuilding  Commission


WOMEN, WAR &
PEACE WEB PORTAL

UNIFEM
PeaceWomen


 

JOIN WILPF

wilpf logo

 

INDIA CRACKS DOWN ON MEDIA, NGOS IN DISTURBED NORTHEAST
By Syed Zarir Hussain


August 25, 2004 - (One World) The banning of a private television channel in the northeast Indian state of Manipur combined with the federal government's accusation Tuesday that at least five nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in the region have links with militants has triggered a controversy in this already volatile region.

The twin moves have come as thousands of angry protestors hit the streets in Manipur, demanding the withdrawal of a federal anti-terror law that gives sweeping powers to the military to shoot at sight and arrest anybody without a warrant.

What has riled people in India's neglected northeast is the federal Home Ministry's decision Tuesday to place five NGOs working in the region on the watchlist for suspected links with rebel armies.

"All the five NGOs have some links with terrorist organizations in the northeast," India's junior Home Minister Sri Prakash Jaiswal told the Indian Parliament.

The organizations are the United Committee of Manipur (UCM), the Manab Adhikar Sangram Samity (MASS), the Northeast Coordination Committee of
Human Rights (NECCHR), the Naga People's Movement for Human Rights (NPMHR), and the Naga Students' Federation (NSF).

The UCM is a rights group in Manipur which came into the limelight in 2001 after it spearheaded a violent agitation to oppose the extension of the
jurisdiction of a ceasefire by New Delhi with a Naga tribal separatist group in Nagaland state. MASS, NECCHR and NPHMR are all rights groups in Assam and Nagaland, while the NSF is an influential students group in Nagaland.

The NGOs, of course, vehemently deny any truck with terrorists. "It is very easy for the government to dub us pro-militant. But the fact is that whoever raises the banner of revolt against the government invites New Delhi's wrath and that is precisely what has happened to us," claims UCM leader S. Singh.

"We don't have any links with militant groups. We have the support of the people and it was proved when the whole of Manipur was with us during the anti-ceasefire agitation in 2001," he adds.

The other NGOs have also lashed out at the government's statement.

"It is nothing but an attempt to defame rights groups like us who always espouse the cause of innocent civilians who are tortured and harassed by security forces in the name of curbing militancy," declares NPMHR spokesman N. Krome.

The state governments in Assam, Manipur and Nagaland are tightlipped about New Delhi's move to paint the five NGOs in militant colors.

"Perhaps the federal intelligence agencies may have given the Home Ministry some inputs and so the minister made such a statement," remarks a senior Nagaland police official.

"We are yet to get details of the home ministry report and so cannot comment on the charges. Unless we get specific reports it is difficult for us to act or take any action against the NGOs in question," says Nagaland home minister T. Lotha.

Similar views were echoed by the Assam and Manipur government's on the federal home minister's statement.

The drive against the NGOs followed pot shots at the media. On August 14, a day before India's Independence Day, the Manipur government asked the Information Service Television Network (ISTN) to shut down transmission with immediate effect.

"The district magistrate issued an order prohibiting the transmission of ISTN under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, in the name of public interest," says a government spokesman.

ISTN is a popular - and the only independent - television network in Manipur, which borders Myanmar. The channel produces news bulletins in the local Metei dialect, besides the usual entertainment fare.

"We were showing the protests and the agitation in Manipur over the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in our news bulletins like normal professionals. We did not exaggerate but were very objective in our reporting and showed events as they happened," says ISTN secretary Khagendro Singh.

"The order barring us from transmitting news and entertainment programs is nothing but an infringement on the freedom of expression and attempts at gagging the freedom of the press," he protests.

What seems to have angered the government are visual images of thousands of people taking to the streets to protest the law and the subsequent
incidents of the military firing rubber bullets at protestors and bursting teargas canisters to scatter the mobs.

"The authorities thought ISTN was the only channel viewed by the locals as we tried to come up with exclusive visuals of the developments. The government-run television network, Doordarshan, was showing nothing. So they tried to stop us," explains ISTN president T. Kulesho.

But ISTN wasn't cowed down. The channel's management hit back on August 18 by filing a petition in the high court and on Tuesday an interim order was passed where the court decided to "suspend" the government order barring the channel from transmission.

"The court says we can broadcast or transmit news as long as we do not disturb public tranquility," contends the channel's legal counsel B.B. Sahu.

"The court's order vindicates our claim that we were airing news in an objective manner as the people of Manipur have the right to information."

Though ISTN has got a lifeline, the journalist fraternity isn't mollified. The All Manipur Working Journalists Union has asked the state government to come up with an explanation for trying to gag the freedom of the press by banning ISTN.

Local journalists have for long complained about the dangers of being a media person in the insurgency-hit region. "Journalists in Manipur have always been at the receiving end from both the government and rebel armies," says a senior journalist.

At least half-a-dozen journalists were killed in the northeast by rebels during the past five years, while more than a dozen were arrested on charges of aiding and abetting militancy.

"Journalists in the northeast are always under tremendous pressure from both the state machinery and the underground groups," says Pradip Phanjoubam, the editor of Imphal Free Press, the leading English daily from Manipur's capital, Imphal.

There are more than 30-odd rebel armies in India's restive northeast with demands ranging from secession to greater autonomy and the right to self-determination. More than 50,000 people have lost their lives to insurgency in the region since India's independence in 1947.

From: South Asia Citizen's Wire, August 25-26, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS
1325 PeaceWomen E-News
Country News Index
International News
Peacekeeping News


RESOURCES
Country & Thematic
  Civil Society, UN & Government

1325 Advocacy Tools


INITIATIVES
In-country
Regional and Global

1325 in Action


ORGANIZATIONS
Country-specific
International


LATEST PEACEWOMEN UPDATES


PEACEWOMEN NGO WEB RING
Women, Peace & Security Community representing the diversity and depth of research, organizing and advocacy on women, peace and security issues.


Google

WWW
PeaceWomen
 
PeaceWomen.org is a project of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, United Nations Office.
777 UN Plaza, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA
Fair Use Notice:This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. PeaceWomen.org distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.