THE BODY REMEMBERS
The Telegraph Editorial
July 17, 2004 - (The Telegraph) It takes only twelve
women to make a point, and to make it unforgettably. About 40
Manipuri women gathered before the headquarters of the Assam Rifles'
9 Sector in Imphal, of whom twelve stripped to the skin and called
out to the army to come and rape them.
The posters they displayed were equally terrifying,
with the blood red letters on a white background accusing the
"Indian army" of rape and torture. The immediate cause
of this explosive protest was the alleged
torture and killing of Thanglam Manorama by army personnel on
Sunday.
But it was also an expression of pure fury at the
military forces' continued violation of human rights, against
which the many women's organizations in Manipur have been protesting
for a long time. But there was nothing unplanned about the procedure.
Ms Ramani Devi, the secretary of the All Manipur
Social Reformation and Development Samaj, said that the women
had decided to take this step as their protests against extra-judicial
killings and molestation of women in Manipur had gone unheeded.
A spectacle of naked women with loosened hair standing before
the great gates of an army base, yelling at the military forces
to come and rape them is both terrifying and humbling. That it
was planned as an extreme step is indication of an unspeakable
agony that could only be given organized expression by the public
presentation of the naked female body.
For these women, the body, which made them and their
daughters vulnerable, had itself turned into a weapon. By exposing
it, they wished to expose those they felt had humiliated and degraded
them. Manipur
has a long tradition of women's groups fighting against social
evils like alcoholism as well as violence and injustice. Their
struggle is for development and harmony in the midst of bloodshed,
uncertainty and deprivation.
While it is not surprising that a form of protest
unprecedented in the country should first come from them, it should
also be recognized that Manipur's is a traditional society. So
it is not just the courage, intelligence and dignity of the women
that should be acknowledged, but also their feeling of immeasurable
humiliation and injustice.
Their demand was for a public trial of the guilty. This is particularly
relevant in a state where the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act,
1958 is operative. This law gives enormous powers to security
forces. In order to "maintain the public order", they
can arrest, search, detain or kill anyone on the basis of suspicion,
and no investigation of their operations can be carried out by
civil authorities without permission from the Centre.
Protests against human rights violations in the
north-eastern states under the purview of the AFSPA have a long
history. Ms Irom Sharmila Shanu, for example, has been fasting
for three and a half years, demanding that the AFSPA be repealed
in Manipur. She has been kept alive by force-feeding.
It seems incredible that security forces should
open themselves to such allegations, since the militants they
are fighting could find the people's anger useful. It is only
with an agenda against violence and for social development that
such manipulation can be beaten, and it is again the women's groups
which are leading that effort in Manipur.