|
IRAN'S NOBEL WINNER DOESN'T MAKE
THE NEWS AT HOME
By Scott Peterson
December 12, 2003 (Christian Science Monitor)
Shirin Ebadi accepted her Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo Wednesday to
standing ovations and blanket media coverage of her mission to improve
democracy and human rights in Iran.
But at home, Iran's state-run Channel One ranked Ms. Ebadi's achievement
twelfth in the lineup - after a Taiwan earthquake and a trade fair.
The now-famous defense lawyer - the first Muslim woman to win the
Nobel - has been heralded by some as a hero who can energize Iran's
embattled reform movement. But she has been largely ignored or threatened
by hardliners who see her global prestige and continued push for
human rights in Iran as a further threat to their rule.
The thin media coverage points to the difficulties Ebadi faces as
her profile rises in Iran's relentless, rough-and-tumble political
battlefield.
"This prize has put Ebadi on the front line in Iran,"
says an Iranian analyst who asked not to be named. "She is
stuck between those who advocate nonviolence and those who ... use
violence - between [those] who call for gradual change and those
who want it now."
Ebadi was Iran's first woman judge before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
She has often taken on prickly cases - including one in 2000 that
led to her imprisonment for collecting sensitive video evidence.
Most recently, she has joined the case of a woman photojournalist
with dual Iranian-Canadian citizenship who was killed during interrogation
in July. Yet many Iranians never knew Ebadi's name before she won
the Nobel.
Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi, when asked about the Nobel,
told parliament: "It's a source of pride for Iran that an Iranian
is given the Nobel Peace Prize."
But the reform newspaper Shargh - aware that more than 100 reform
publications have been shut down in recent years - ran a Page 1
photo of the ceremony, but showed only a close-up of Ebadi's hands
as she received the Nobel diploma.
Fleeting footage on Iran TV showed just a glimpse of the Nobel ceremony,
bypassing the prizewinner herself. The hard-line paper Jomhuri-e-Eslami
- in a clear bid to emphasize the scale of her disrespect - was
the only newspaper that ran a full photograph of Ebadi accepting
the Nobel, and the $1.4 million prize - without a head scarf. The
story made disapproving mention of the fact that Ebadi shook hands
with a man after a BBC interview.
At the ceremony, Ebadi lambasted US and Israeli double standards
on human rights, and dug at regimes that use Islam to justify their
hard-line rule.
"Some Muslims, under the pretext that democracy and human rights
are not compatible with Islamic teachings ... have justified despotic
governments and continue to do so," Ebadi said in Oslo, pointing
the finger at Iran's ruling clergy. "In fact, it is not so
easy to rule over a people who are aware of their rights using traditional
patriarchal and paternalistic methods."
While Ebadi has been heralded in the West as a new symbol of Iran's
reform movement - which has withered under constant attack from
unelected hard-liners - in Iran her position is far less secure.
"Considering the indifference and frustration that hang over
people, this Nobel Prize has appeared as a slim light of hope,"
says Davoud Hermidas Bavand, a professor of law at the Supreme National
Defense University. "But [Ebadi] is in a very delicate situation.
People are looking to her, and she's trying to walk a tightrope."
Analysts say the Nobel gives Ebadi a new degree of protection, but
doesn't bestow power to bridge divisions in the reform camp, or
a "golden key," as she says, to open cell doors for political
prisoners.
Highlighting Ebadi's privileged but difficult position, the reform
newspaper Yas-e-No ran a cartoon Thursday, showing a bright gold
Nobel medal emerging as a flower from a tangle of thorns.
The fact that Ebadi has not been overtly political before adds to
her clout today. "The conservatives are frightened by this
phenomenon of Shirin Ebadi winning the Nobel," says Hamid Reza
Jalaeipour, an editor who has seen seven of his reform newspapers
closed, and now teaches at Tehran University.
"Why are they afraid? Because she has good influence with the
secular elite, as well as Muslim reformists," says Mr. Jalaeipour.
"In the midterm, she can protect the democratic trend in Iran."
Ebadi gets points for bravery for vowing to continue her legal quest
for human rights, he adds, since hard-liners here consider such
work "against God and anti-religious activity."
Indeed, death threats from vigilantes who consider Ebadi a "Western
mercenary" - such as those who recently rushed the podium during
a speech at a women's university, shouting "Death to Ebadi!"
and forcing her to seek shelter among supporters - have prompted
officials to provide a car, driver, and bodyguards.
But hard-liners are not Ebadi's only critics. Students have deplored
her insistence - echoing the once-popular President Mohamed Khatami,
who is widely criticized for wasting the mandate of two landslide
election victories - that Islam and democracy are compatible, and
that change should come from within. Students are also critical
of Ebadi's call to vote in February parliamentary elections, while
some angry reformers demand a boycott. "Ebadi has many experiences;
most students on campus have little experience. They have high demands
that they can't manage," says Jalaeipour. "When she goes
abroad and takes off her head scarf, it's a revolutionary activity
in the Iranian context. They don't understand that."
Still, some who witnessed Ebadi's return from a European visit at
Tehran's airport, after the prize was announced in October, were
not impressed. Those who greeted her were tearfully joyful but few.
A phone text message had been widely circulated: "Shirin Ebadi.
Tuesday night. Mehrabad airport. See you."
"Why did only a few thousand come? There should be so many,
in a city of 10 million," says a reformist who was there. "It's
embarrassing. The apathy is so thick."
From: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1212/p01s04-wosc.html
|