PeaceWomen
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
  
HOME-------------CALENDAR-------------ABOUT US-------------CONTACT US-------------SITE MAP

UNSC RESOLUTION 1325
Full text
History and Analysis
Who's Responsible for Implementing 1325?
1325 in Action
1325 Advocacy Tools

TRANSLATING 1325

WOMEN, WAR AND
PEACE WEB PORTAL

UNIFEM
PeaceWomen

UNITED NATIONS
Women and the UN
Security Council (SC)
Gender and Peacekeeping
Women and Gender Issues in SC Resolutions
Gender Focal Points

NEWS
1325 PeaceWomen E-News
Country News Index
International News
Peacekeeping News
News Sources

RESOURCES
Country-specific and thematic
civil society, UN and government documents

ORGANIZATIONS
Country-specific
International

INITIATIVES
In-country
Regional and Global

NGO WORKING GROUP ON WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY


JOIN WILPF


Fair Use Notice:
This page contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

PeaceWomen.org distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

 

Iraq Constitution 'Big Disappointment' for Women

August 29, 2005 - (Feminist Daily News Wire) Iraq's draft constitution was finalized on Sunday and will be sent to voters for a nationwide referendum to be held in six weeks. The finalized draft includes language of grave concern to women in Iraq – namely, that Islam is to be considered “a basic source of law” and that no law may contradict the “undisputed rules” of Islam.

According to the Associated Press, the final document also calls for the Supreme Federal Court to include judges and experts in both law and sharia (Islamic) law, which suggests that clerics may serve on the Supreme Court, further endangering women’s rights.

The document also allows Iraqis to choose whether they follow secular law or sharia law in family matters, such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance. What is not clear, however, is how the law will address differences in opinion between a husband and a wife or a father and a daughter over which law to follow. On “Meet the Press” yesterday, Tim Russert asked Zalmay Khalilzad, US Ambassador to Iraq, what would happen if, for example, a Shiite man took his wife to a Shiite religious court – would “that woman … have equal protection?” Khalilzad said that would be regulated by the legislature.

Safia Taleb al-Souhail, the Iraqi woman given a prominent spot in President Bush’s 2005 State of the Union address, had previously publicly denounced the prominence given to Islamic law in settling family matters in the constitution, which remained intact in the final version. “When we came back from exile, we thought we were going to improve the rights and position of women,” said Souhail, now Iraq’s Ambassador to Egypt, according to Reuters. But look what happened – we have lost all the gains we made over the last 30 years. It’s a big disappointment.”

From: http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=9239