|
IRAQI WOMEN RAISE VOICES - FOR
QUOTAS
By Annia Ciezadlo
Women in the interim government push for guaranteed representation
in drafting a constitution.
December 17, 2003 (Christian Science Monitor)
As an exiled opposition leader, Safia al-Souhail battled most of
her life to get rid of Iraq's old government. Now she's fighting
to get into the new one.
Since the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, Ms. Souhail has been
pleading a new cause: quotas for women in Iraq's new government
- in the cabinet, in the national parliament, and in drafting the
constitution. "They have seats for Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds,
Assyrians," says the human rights activist, "and they
didn't think that they should have a seat for [half of] the country?"
On Oct. 7, Souhail and women from around Iraq presented their demands
to Paul Bremer, the top US administrator in Iraq. They wanted women
to make up at least one-third of the committee drafting Iraq's new
constitution, as well as "all political institutions,"
including the parliament and local councils.
But while such quotas featured prominently in Afghanistan's draft
constitution, unveiled Nov. 3, the Coalition Provisional Authority
has declined to support the idea in Iraq. "There are no plans
for quotas," a CPA official says. "But we are planning
on empowering women through ... women's organizations, democracy
trainings, and involving them in the political process."
Without strong US support, especially in the opening stages, experts
say women may be left out of Iraq's new government. "US support
is very important, because you're talking about an interim authority,"
says Julie Ballington of the International Institute for Democracy
and Electoral Assistance in Stockholm. "Because of the moment
of history, it's the political will of the big players that determines
whether quotas will be considered."
In recent years, an increasing number of countries, especially those
shifting from dictatorship to democracy, have used quotas to make
sure women are elected to national parliaments. In South Africa,
after the African National Congress required women in lists of candidates
for the 1994 elections, the proportion of women in parliament jumped
to 27 percent, from 3 percent. In Rwanda, which set aside seats
for women at the local and national levels, the number of women
in parliament hit 49 percent in this year's elections - the highest
level in any government in the world.
But in "postconflict" countries, quotas can cause tensions
between transitional administrators and those they are supervising.
In East Timor, a network of women pushed for quotas between 1999
and 2001, the period under UN administration. At their urging, the
UN required quotas for local councils and civil service. The National
Council, selected from the local councils, was 40 percent female.
When it came to quotas for the committee writing a new constitution,
however, the UN balked. Citing objections from some Security Council
members, the UN argued that quotas contravened free and fair elections.
East Timorese opinion was divided. In the end, the National Council
- including most of its women members - voted against quotas in
the committee.
In the Arab world, only five countries have electoral quotas, four
of them in North Africa. Worldwide, the average proportion of women
in national parliaments is 14 percent. In countries with quotas,
it is 17 percent. In the 22 Arab League member states, the average
is 3.5 percent.
Unlike most Arab countries, Iraq has a long tradition of women in
public life, dating back to the monarchy. Even under Mr. Hussein,
the number of women in civil service jobs reached 40 percent. But
the quality of their healthcare, education, income, and liberty
deteriorated.
The disparity between public presence and private welfare makes
some Iraqis skeptical of quotas. "Given the current situation
of Iraqi women, it might be a little bit difficult," says Hiwa
Osman, editor of the Iraq Crisis Report. "We are living in
a patriarchal society, and to inject female elements at the top
of the government will not change the situation of women on the
ground. If you create a healthy environment in which female leaders
can emerge, that will be much more effective."
Souhail disagrees. "We have to have a quota," she says.
"This is the only way to force them to have a number of skillful
women. After people have become more educated to this, they won't
need it."
Her own experience bears this out. As the daughter of a powerful
tribal sheikh, who helped her father plan a coup against Hussein,
Souhail is an increasingly influential voice inside Iraq. Her father
led a Central Iraqi tribe called the Bani Tamim. When he was killed
by Iraqi intelligence, she became the tribe's political representative,
a highly unusual role for a woman. To Bani Tamim members - approximately
a million - she is "the Sheikha."
But while "Sheikha Safia" commands respect, her push for
quotas has met resistance. As one of three women in Iraq's 65-member
"government in exile," chosen in London in January, she
repeatedly asked for more women. Iraq's exile leaders, all men,
laughed at her. "They were talking about democracy, but they
were laughing at the idea of having just one more woman," she
says with scorn.
When the coalition appointed the 25-member Iraqi Governing Council
in July, it included only three women. Akila al-Hashemi was mortally
wounded on Sept. 20. After interviewing several women, Souhail among
them, the council appointed Shiite dentistry professor Salama al-Khufaji
on Dec. 8.
Ms. Khufaji aside, all the women in the interim government have
advocated quotas: Raja Habib Khuzai and Songul Chapouk, the Governing
Council's two other female members; Nisrin Barwari, the only woman
in the 25-member cabinet; and Rend Rahim Francke, Iraq's newly appointed
ambassador to the United States.
Iraqi women hoped the new transitional plan - for 18 regional caucuses
to select a provisional government by the end of June - would use
quotas. But the plan, negotiated between Mr. Bremer and the Governing
Council, does not include that.
Now women are pinning their hopes on the country's constitution-writing
process.
"This is the perfect time to bring up the discussion,"
says Ms. Ballington. "Because it's part of plans that are ongoing,
you're not imposing them on a system already set in stone. It's
an opportunity that exists right now, and will not for much longer."
From: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1217/p01s02-woiq.html
|