|
RWANDA: JUSTICE ELUDES MANY
1994 GENOCIDE SURVIVORS
By: Aimable Twahirwa
July 31, 2006 - (IPS) Fear and intimidation have
slowed the progress of reconciliatory justice for survivors of the
1994 genocide in Rwanda that claimed the lives of over 800,000 people.
Four years after traditional courts called "gacaca" (literally
"justice on the grass" in the Kinyarwanda language) were
set up to try some 63,000 cases by end-2007, judgments have been
delivered in only 6,267 cases. The gacaca system is based on voluntary
confessions and apologies by wrongdoers. In the genocide cases,
community members were invited to participate in the trial stage.
The government had turned to the traditional system
of justice to relieve the burden on conventional courts, which would
have taken decades to try the suspects. But survivors, local and
international jurists have expressed doubts about the ability of
the system to deliver the promised reconciliatory justice. Several
jurists, who did not want to be identified, expressed disappointment
over the "slow wheels" of this new system of justice.
Non-governmental groups representing survivors
are of the opinion that witnesses for the prosecution are anxious
because the authorities have failed to guarantee their protection
against attacks by family members of the accused. "Several
dozen survivors were killed because they wanted to be defense witnesses
in the gacaca. It's sad and scandalous to observe that the same
situation still exists," said Benoit Kaboyi, executive secretary
of 'Ibuka' ("remember"): one of the main survivors' organisations.
Charlotte Murebwayire of Buhanda, central Rwanda,
is a widow who lost her husband and five children in the genocide.
She has been humiliated and threatened with death several times
for daring to testify for the prosecution in the gacaca. One anonymous
mail that she found on her door one morning warned: "It's not
enough just to shut you up. Your very existence is a danger to us."
Murebwayire lives in a village built for widows and child-headed
families orphaned in 1994. "I can imagine what would eventually
happen to my life," she said, resignedly.
In 1994, minority Tutsis and politically moderate
Hutus were targeted by Hutu extremists over a three-month period
of blood-letting. The massacres followed the death of Rwandan president
Juvenal Habyarimana and the Burundian head of state whose plane
was shot down over Kigali on Apr. 6 that year. "This country's
social fabric was torn apart when thousands of lives were lost.
Parents killed children and vice-versa; some people killed their
neighbours," recalled Domitille Mukantaganzwa, executive secretary
of the national authority in charge of gacaca courts.
Mukantaganzwa, who authored a report on gacaca
published Jun. 30, has calculated that the courts' decisions were
challenged in just 1,371 cases. Of these, only 675 are still under
investigation; in addition, 436 persons have been transferred to
a list of important suspects who allegedly participated directly
in the planning and execution of the genocide.
"The genocide's foremost accused perpetrators
will be judged in the traditional courts," Mukantaganzwa explained.
She hinted that the mandate for the gacaca trials is likely to be
pushed beyond the end-2007 deadline, especially if new cases implicating
fresh suspects are presented. Following a joint inquiry conducted
in June by expert lawyers, Mukantaganzwa said the total number of
people to appear before the gacaca could go as high as 761,446.
"Such reconciliatory justice constitutes an important stage
in the eradication of the culture of impunity. It will also contribute
to ending the climate of suspicion, and will allow people once again
to coexist in peace and harmony," she added.
Deo Kalinda, a perpetrator of the genocide who
has been provisionally freed for having repented of his crime publicly,
is of the belief that the gacaca encourage true reconciliatory justice.
"It was difficult to believe that there could be a presidential
pardon for such acts," said this Hutu farmer from Ntongwe,
in south-central Rwanda, who is presently doing community service
for having agreed to testify before the gacaca.
However, rights watchdog Amnesty International
said Rwandan authorities must make sure that the gacaca trials conform
to "basic international standards of equity if they want their
efforts to end impunity to be successful" -- this in a 2002
report on the gacaca. Still, by giving the genocide survivors, the
accused, and witnesses the possibility of airing their cases in
an open environment based on participation for all, the gacaca people's
courts could allow Rwanda to take an important step towards "national
reconciliation and the resolution of the prison crisis," Amnesty
noted. "Justice and national reconciliation will never be a
reality unless the Rwandan government insists on standards of equity
in the gacaca trials," it added.
From: http://www.ipsterraviva.net/Europe/article.aspx?id=3656
|