|
Kashmir: What Difference Do Women
Make?
Kashmiri scholar, journalist and former civil
servant Ather Zia details the range of ways in which women participate
in politics in the disputed region of Kashmir in India. Through
profiles of various women activists, she shows that although women
differ ideologically and in their political actions, they nevertheless
participate increasingly in shaping Kashmir’s future.
March 15, 2008 – (Kashmir Watch) Naseem, an ailing Kashmiri
woman in Salman Rushdie’s novel Midnight’s Children,
is examined by her doctor through a perforated sheet-one afflicted
part at a time. She is described as a “collage of her severally-inspected
parts,” a description that personifies the identity of Kashmiri
women. Although media portrays them as victims positioned between
the separatists and the Indian armed forces, there is no one definitive
motif that can reveal their true identity and status. On one hand,
portraying their victimhood seems inevitable; on the other, it is
incorrect to assert that all Kashmiri women have been neutral or
home-front bound in the ongoing conflict.
In the past 19 years of an armed struggle against India, Kashmir
has suffered massive damages of life and property. In the absence
of male breadwinners, women of this conservative and patriarchal
society were pushed into the public sphere. General and sexual violence
by the Indian security forces, in addition to the war bereavements,
gave rise to psychiatric and psychosomatic illnesses, especially
in women. The turmoil, however, has had a catalytic effect on gender
mainstreaming: today there is an increasing clamor for women’s
participation in the evolving Kashmiri political and economic processes.
Women, Politics & Kashmir
Historically women in Kashmir have had a negligible role in politics.
At the time of Kashmir’s partition into India-administered
and Pakistan-administered regions in 1947, only a few women were
politically active, mostly due to their family affiliations. This
is evident in the likes of Akbar Jehan, wife of the former Prime
Minister and popular political leader Sheikh Abdullah, who herself
became an activist and a Parliamentarian. Many notable social activists
also hailed from political families.
The political world of Kashmir is colored by varied loyalties and
competing nationalisms. On one side, there is pro-India politics,
which forms the basis of administration and governance for the disputed
region. It is peopled by pro-India political parties which may differ
on some issues, but owe their ultimate allegiance to India. Then
there is separatist politics, which comprises the armed insurgent
groups and political fronts. These outfits also have differing motives;
some want accession to Pakistan and others seek Independence. The
chaotic political horizon boasts a handful of female faces who are
prominent, but enjoy little public acknowledgement. Many of them
are engaged in separatist politics, while some pursue the pro-Indian
agenda. Women’s presence in both factions is minimal in comparison
to men’s.
Amidst these two extreme positions, there are also women fighting
for social justice and against human rights violations. Although
many women are involved in efforts of peacemaking at a grassroots
level, the gender dimension is often ignored when it comes to their
involvement in significant forums.
Specters on the Spectrum Women activists play prominent roles across
this political spectrum.
Asiya Andrabi, Orthodox Social Activist & Kashmiri Separatist
Asiya Andrabi’s severely veiled face represents one end of
the political spectrum, manifesting an extreme fringe element of
religious orthodoxy wedded to a political cause. Asiya gains much
media recognition for her radical agenda and her sound bites spike
media ratings. However, she does not entirely represent all women
in the separatist movement. There are moderate women separatists
like Yasmeen Raja and Fareeda Behenji who pursue political policies
sans religious beliefs.
Asiya heads the Dukhtaran-e-Millat (Daughters of the Nation), an
organization she initially formed to fight social ills and secure
women’s rights as conferred on them by Islam. She worked to
ban dowry, pornographic films, prostitution, and liquor stores.
After 1989, Asiya’s organization became politically active
for Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan, a cause that her incarcerated
and formerly-armed separatist husband espouses.
Mehbooba Mufti, pro-India Politician
In 1996, Mehbooba Mufti emerged on the other end of the political
spectrum. With her visibly coiffed hair topped by stylish headscarves,
she began propagating her father’s pro-Indian legacy. She
was elected to the legislative assembly, along with Sakina Ittoo,
also a politician’s daughter, who was later slain by insurgents.
Mehbooba co-founded the People’s Democratic Party with her
father Mufti Mohammad Sayeed. After winning the elections, her father
was propelled into the chief minister’s chair. However, winning
an election in Kashmir is not necessarily an indicator for popularity
or ideological credibility. Kashmiri elections have always been
a contentious issue, habitually rigged, with the results more often
a technicality than a real democratic harvest. Mehbooba herself
acknowledges the voting situation: “10 to 12 percent people
do not vote because of their ideological convictions. Between 25
to 30 percent do not vote because of the fear of gun. Then there
is a big chunk of 30 to 35 percent of voters who think they will
not vote because their votes are not going to be counted.”
The people who may vote lurk under 50 percent, even when the lesser
projections are considered. So it’s not surprising that for
a woman who burst onto the scene playing the gender and human rights
card, Mehbooba was soon reduced to a political rhetoric in a gentler
voice.
Parveena Ahangar, Chief, Association of Parents of Disappeared
Persons
In 1994, a son of Parveena Ahangar, an unlettered, house-bound mother,
disappeared after being arrested by the Indian army. Instead of
languishing in private grief, Parveena joined forces with Parvez
Imroz, a lawyer-activist, and established the Association of Parents
of Disappeared Persons (APDP). APDP mobilizes relatives of the people
who have disappeared in custody of the Indian armed forces. Parveena
is its chairperson.
Within the Kashmir’s pro-India political scene, Parveena’s
organization carries little weight. She and other members of her
organization are constantly beaten, intimidated and harassed. In
1998, APDP suffered a huge setback when an unidentified gunman killed
the vice chairperson Halima and her son. The organization suspects
pro-government militants, but no one has been arrested so far. APDP
continues its mission through hunger strikes, protests and sit-ins.
Their efforts have been recognized world over and have garnered
a huge moral following. The APDP members meet on the 25th of every
month to protest in a sit-in, where little semi-orphan children,
half-widows, mothers and other relatives are seen holding placards
and wearing headbands with names of their vanished kin.
From:http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showarticles.php?subaction=showfull&id=1205572974&archive=&start_from=&ucat=3&var0news=value0news
|