|
No Justice
for Darfur Rape Victims
Activists call on ICC to bring alleged rapists in
Darfur to trial, as reports speak of a massive upsurge in rape cases.
By Stephanie Nieuwoudt
October 25, 2006 - (IWPR) Whenever I have taken a camera into
one of the many camps for refugees in Darfur, the children have
immediately arranged themselves into a group. They want to be in
the picture. And they insist on seeing the digital image. They smile
and laugh while they point themselves out.
At first glance, the burgeoning camps always seem happy places
because of the uninhibited excitement of the children - that is
if you ignore the tattered clothes and the reports from aid agencies,
which paint a bleak picture. For the truth is that the settlements
- known in international bureaucratic jargon as camps for Internally
Displaced Persons - are places, once you move beyond the children's
cheery welcomes, where human suffering can be smelled, seen and
touched. And women and girls seem to bear the brunt of the suffering.
Fiona Laird, a midwife posted until recently at southern Darfur's
Kalma camp with the aid agency Médecins Sans Frontiéres,
MSF, spoke in a BBC radio interview about the horrific rape cases
she had seen on a daily basis. The worst case was that of a nine-year-old
girl who had left the refugee encampment to gather grass for thatch
and as fuel.
A smiling man approached her and asked her to help him. She agreed,
but as they moved further from the camp she told him her mother
had told her not to wander so far. Turning ugly, the man gagged
her and tied her on top of the bundles of grass before raping her
repeatedly. On release, she staggered back to the camp where Laird
treated her for bleeding so severe that the child was unable to
walk for many days afterwards.
In new reports to the United Nations Security Council, UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan and six separate UN agencies have condemned what they
describe as a “massive upsurge in rape in Darfur”. The
reports come as the Nairobi-based African Women's Development and
Communications Network, FEMNET, has urged the International Criminal
Court, ICC, in The Hague to bring alleged rapists in Darfur to trial.
"The ICC offers an alternative avenue for justice - other
than that provided by Sudan - for the women and girls who comprise
almost ninety per cent of the victims in the Darfur conflict,"
said FEMNET communications officer Christine Butegwa. The UN reports
say that attacks on women and girls occur both inside and outside
the refugee camps, with many different groups participating in the
crimes.
Warring parties seek retribution against their opponents by inflicting
humiliating punishment on civilians in complete disregard of obligations
under international law. As in the case of the little girl described
by Laird, it is not only the “enemy” who rape women
and children. In many cases it is also those who should protect
them - policemen, elders from the communities and soldiers of the
national Sudanese Army, as well as rebel fighters from the Sudan
Liberation Movement/Army, SLM/A, and the Justice and Equality Movement,
JEM.
In 2005 there were many reports of members of the Janjaweed - Arab
militia supported by the Sudan government - raping darker skinned
African women, telling them they would bear light skinned babies.
Human rights activists have described rape of this kind as a form
of ethnic cleansing, a claim that goes to the heart of the allegation
that “rolling genocide” is slowly but surely taking
place in Darfur. It is a story that is told from Darfur on a daily
basis many times over.
In the Darfur settlement of Rokero, an international aid worker
described to Washington Post reporter Emily Wax the mass rape by
Sudan government militiamen of some 400 women. "It's systematic,"
said the aid worker. "Everyone knows how the father carries
the lineage in the culture [of Sudan]. They [the militiamen] want
more Arab babies [by Darfur's African women] to take the land."The
scary thing is that I don't think we realise the extent of how widespread
this is yet."
Since the conflict began in Darfur in February 2003, more than
two million people have been displaced and between 200,000 and 400,000
killed. The uprising by rebel groups can be traced back to the discontent
of black African tribes with what they initially described as Khartoum’s
“marginalisation” of the people of Darfur, an arid area
the size of France in western Sudan.
After peace talks brokered by the African Union, the Sudan government
and a faction of the SLM/A under the leadership of Minni Minnawi
signed a peace deal in May. But other rebel groups refused to sign
and stepped up their anti-government guerrilla warfare. Minnawi's
faction turned on its former resistance allies and joined in attacks
on them with government forces.
In a situation of increasing complexity, civilians inevitably bear
the brunt of the violence. Government and rebel forces create fear
as they raid and capture villages, destroy or grab crops and rape
and kill members of the local population. The conflict is widely
interpreted along ethnic lines: brown-skinned Arabs against black
Africans. Years of intermarriage between Arabs and Africans have
diluted distinguishing physical characteristics, but the cultural
divides established down the centuries persist.
Ordinary people flee their villages in panic during the daily attacks.
They walk for days on end to reach one of many refugee camps in
Darfur or across the border in neighbouring Chad. In September,
Jan Egeland, UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs,
said the UN was feeding more than three million Darfurians.
Those who reach the camps do not always find the security they
long for. Egeland said around a million people in refugee camps
are out of reach of humanitarian aid because the fighting makes
it impossible for aid workers to get to many areas. The United States
government has accused the Sudan government of genocide in Darfur.
Late in the twentieth century there were genocides in Rwanda and
the former Yugoslavia. In both cases, rape was used as a weapon
of ethnic cleansing, as in Darfur. During the Yugoslav war, thousands
of Muslim women were raped by Serbian and other forces. According
to "Women War Peace", an assessment of the impact of armed
conflict on women published by the UN Development Fund for Women
UNIFEM, tens of thousands of Bosnian Muslim women were deliberately
raped and impregnated by Serbian men to “dilute” the
Bosnian identity.
Little attention was given to rape as a war crime until comparatively
recently. This changed in 1998 when Jean-Paul Akayesu, a former
mayor in Rwanda, was convicted of genocide at the International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Arusha, Tanzania. Akayesu was indicted
on various counts, including rape. It was the first time the crime
was included as a component of genocide in an international court
ruling.
Aid organisations working in Darfur have found that women raped
there are often further traumatised if they dare to report the incident
to the police. Sally Chin, an analyst working in Sudan for the Brussels-based
International Crisis Group, said that women often find the policeman
they report a rape to is the same man who raped them. They are often
also accused by police of waging war on the central government.
A Médecins Sans Frontiéres report describes how a
16-year old Darfur girl who became pregnant after being raped came
up against Sudan's archaic and discriminatory laws which demand,
among other things, that any woman alleging rape has to do the impossible
and provide four male witnesses to support the charge.
When the girl was eight months pregnant, police officers charged
her with contravening a Sudanese law that makes extra-marital sex
illegal. She was locked up with 23 other women - all victims of
rape - and beaten up daily. She was released after ten days, but
only after paying a fine to atone for her “sin” of having
sex out of wedlock and becoming pregnant.
Jane Lindrio Alao, a psychologist working with the Amel Centre
for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture, based
in Darfur, said of the requirement that four male witnesses are
needed for rape to be proved, "All four should witness the
actual penetration. So even if you could get two such witnesses,
the accused could not be charged. How many women have the luxury
of having witnesses to their rape?"
Huge numbers of abandoned babies are among the consequences of
unwanted pregnancies resulting from rape in Darfur. An aid worker
who spoke to IWPR on condition of anonymity said, “Life in
the camps is extremely hard. The women cannot deal with the stigma
attached to babies born out of rape and often abandon the infants.
“These communities often shun the woman when they find out
she is pregnant. It does not matter that she was raped. According
to their beliefs, a woman who has had pre-marital sex and has become
pregnant is tainted.” There are no reliable social services
to care for the abandoned children, according to a report by the
United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF, “Children born
out of rape/wedlock”.
Babies are brought to the police who take them to hospitals: but
many are found too late to save their lives. For those who survive,
there is no standard procedure or service offered after the hospital
examination. Access to medical care is yet another trauma. In Darfur's
traditional societies, it is seen as an aberration for a woman to
be treated by a male doctor. And raped women who can get access
to medical care may not want to seek help for fear of the unknown,
which in turn leads to health and emotional problems like sexually
transmitted diseases and depression.
In Rwanda, rape victims get a sense of justice, which aids the
healing process, when they see their perpetrators being brought
to the Rwandan tribunal or taken through traditional “gacaca”
village assembly courts where perpetrators of lesser crimes are
brought to justice. Victims of the Yugoslavia genocide also see
justice done at the International Court for the Former Yugoslavia.
In Darfur, there is not yet any kind of retribution. Countless
thousands of raped women and girls live with the knowledge that
they may die from HIV infections or other complications caused by
rape without ever seeing justice being done. Although the ICC has
severe limitations, Christine Butegwa of FEMNET said she and other
members of the two-year-old Darfur Consortium, which brings together
more than 200 African civil society organisations, hope that current
investigations into war crimes in Darfur by the court’s chief
prosecutor, Argentina's Luis Moreno-Ocampo, will result in fair
trials and compensation for victims of sexual violence.
The Amel Centre's Jane Lindrio Alao said, "Refugees and rape
victims among the women are keeping silent and protecting themselves,
waiting for the day of the ICC."
Stephanie Nieuwoudt is a freelance South African journalist based
in Nairobi who frequently reports from Arusha on the ICTR trials.
From: http://www.iwpr.net/?p=acr&s=f&o=324842&apc_state=henh
|