|
Uganda: Granting Women Rights
to Own Land
By : Moses Sserwanga
February 26, 2007 – (The Monitor) The new
government proposed land policy is causing a media frenzy as different
interest groups position themselves to protect their interests.
Paradoxically though, not much is being said about the rights of
the traditional disadvantaged sections of our population particularly
the women who have for centuries been denied their fundamental rights
to own land.
It's well over a decade now since the Reform Agenda
aimed at righting the cultural and social economic wrongs that hinder
the economic progress of women and other traditional disadvantaged
groups was launched by the National Resistance Movement (NRM) political
party.
In the 1990s, Uganda adopted various enabling policies
and laws, which were specifically geared at promoting women's empowerment
and active role in the development of their families and communities.
Most of these government policies and programmes recognised the
need to improve women's access and ownership of land. However, the
challenge still remains especially in terms of effective implementation
of these laws and policies for the benefit of the intended people.
Until recently, the land legal framework in this
country was of a patriarchal nature intended to maintain the male
dominance over women in land resource control and utilisation. In
many of our traditional settings, a woman is basically a labourer
who is not expected to lay any claim to property rights. In the
long term, the woman suffers marginalisation.
This is irrespective of the fact that land use
in Uganda, as elsewhere-in Sub-Saharan Africa is primarily an activity
of the womenfolk. It is estimated that between 70-80 percent of
the country's agricultural labour is supplied by women only 7 percent
of whom hold titles to land. Other estimates indicate that only
30 percent of Uganda's women can claim secure access to land or
control of its produce.
According to the Poverty Eradication Action Plan
(PEAP), women in many parts of the country are unable to own or
inherit land due to restrictive practices under customary tenure.
In this country, the majority of women are subjected to the oppressive
customary law practices.
Gross inequity
For instance, in divorce cases under Customary
Law women are not considered when division of matrimonial assets,
including land is made. This is because divorce amounts to loss
of labour by the husband. Similarly, upon the demise of a husband,
under Customary Law, a widow does not inherit property including
land. She instead holds such land in trust for her children who
assume ownership upon reaching the maturity age. Alternatively,
the clan or relatives appoint a heir who inherits all the property
including land, which the widow has tilled in many cases - for donkeys
years. And the cycle continues.
Attempts in the Land Act to redress this situation
by proscribing discriminatory practices in land ownership, occupation
and use, and further requiring spousal consent to transactions involving
family land, have not been successful. Due to ignorance of the law,
poor legal aid services, coupled with the "slave" nature
of the traditional family set up which keeps women in the backyard,
the provisions of the Land Act are but simply ignored.
Now the new land policy seeks to ensure that women
are able to gain secure access to land and that all international
conventions outlawing discrimination against women are fully complied
with. The question then is how will this be achieved?
Involving women
The government is proposing mainstreaming gender
into development planning to improve the status of women. It's proposing
reforms in the country's property laws including those considered
"gender neutral" to ensure equality and equity in ownership
and control of land. However, the most fundamental aspects of the
law that need urgent reform are those related to our customs; those
which condemned women and other traditionally disadvantaged groups
such as the disabled and sick, to perpetual poverty and misery.
The rules of succession call for immediate attention.
In succession matters, the law should have the effect of protecting
the interests of women in ownership of land. Women should also be
fully integrated in all decision-making structures and processes
relating to access and use of land. The new legal regime should
also protect matrimonial land rights of spouses both within and
outside marriages.
At the same time, it's important to note that there
is a significant danger facing pastoral communities occupying dry
lands. In these circumstances, the land use system is characterised
by territorial expansion, transhumance and competition over grasslands,
limited woodlands and watering commons.
Global climate change scientists and the United
Nations Convention to Combat Desertification warn that dry lands
are expanding due, inter alia, to changes in climate parameters.
This means that the ecological resources on which pastoral communities
depend will come under increased stress. This, in turn, will lead
to greater conflict and competition over access to these land resources.
This is already happening in the north and northeastern
parts of Uganda especially in the areas surrounding Mt. Elgon. The
new policy should mitigate the severity of competition and conflict
over land resources by providing alternative land for settlement
of the pastoral communities. At the same time, the new policy should
dissuade such communities (with the help of incentives) to change
their land use practices.
There is the issue of HIV/Aids, which has led to
colossal economic and social costs for Uganda. For not only does
the pandemic lead to a crisis of production and reproduction in
agriculture through persistent morbidity of the population, loss
of agricultural labour, and disablement of the land administration
function, it generates landlessness and poverty through asset transfers,
distress land sales and abuse of land inheritance procedures. The
new land policy should empower widows and people orphaned by HIV/Aids
to access land resources.
From : http://allafrica.com/stories/200702261589.html
|