|
Q & A with Goretti
Ndacayisaba, Dushirehamwe Network - Burundi
Goretti Ndacayisaba, a women’s rights and peace activist
from Burundi visited New York in February and March 2007 to take
part in activities around the 51st session of the UN’s Commission
on the Status of Women. She took time during her visit to sit and
talk to the PeaceWomen Project about her work and the challenges
facing women in Burundi as the country emerges from conflict.
PW: What is your reason for coming to New York?
I am here to attend the 51st Commission on the Status of Women on
behalf of my organization in Burundi. I have been invited by the
NGO working Group on women peace and security, based here in New
York and my goal is to make the voices of women in Burundi heard
by the international community and international NGOs working toward
gender equality. My country is currently on the agenda of the Peacebuilding
Commission so I am also taking this opportunity to find out about
its mission, objectives, and how the commission plans to take into
account our priorities.
PW: What in your view, were the causes of the conflict in
Burundi and how were women affected?
There are many issues that led to the conflict in Burundi but poverty
was a big factor. Also issues of bad governance, deprivation of
human rights, ethnic, regional and other forms of exclusion, including
the marginalization of women.
The conflict in Burundi led to great suffering and disruption. Many
people fled the fighting, much of the population was hungry and
unprotected; many children and elderly people suffered malnutrition
and those who became displaced faced threats of violence including
rape. Women and girls who were raped could not get legal or medical
support, because many were reluctant to speak out and were traumatized.
In our culture, it’s not easy to publicize rape or other sexual
violations, so it’s very tough for survivors to deal with
those incidents.
Even now, after the ceasefire and peace negotiations, women are
still in a very vulnerable situation. They need support at an individual
and collective level and I hope that the new UN Peacebuilding Commission
can begin to understand and respond to the impact of conflict on
women and girls.
PW: Tell us a little about the work that you do?
I work for a Network of women’s groups called Dushirehamwe,
which means “Let’s Reconcile”. It started in 1996
during the conflict that divided Tutsi and Hutu ethnic groups. The
program was initially sponsored by UNIFEM and the NGOs International
Alert and Search for Common Ground.
The three components of our programs are: to build the capacity
of local communities and especially women to understand the causes
of the crisis and change their opinions toward the political and
ethnic issues that were the instrument of the violence, secondly
to see how women’s groups can go together and focus on community
reconciliation, and thirdly, to advocate for women’s participation
in decision making and really push women’s priorities onto
the government’s agenda.
We have tried to bring women together, to discuss what is happening,
to analyze the causes and to train people in community reconciliation.
We have promoted inter-ethnic income-generating activities and cultural
events and worked with other organizations to organize national
meetings. Since then, other programs on the ground have started.
For example, we have programs for reintegration of ex-combatants,
Internally displaced persons, returnees and those who remained in
the villages.
Our goal is to have people define what is good for peaceful co-existence,
to have them adhere to a social contract of respect, harmony and
cohesion among community members.
In addition to stressing community reconciliation, we also recognize
the importance of reaching those in political decision-making, as
they were the most important actors in the conflict. We try to change
minds on how power is shared and to develop a new basis for communicating
with each other and for sharing what we have.
Our advocacy programs are aimed at supporting women participation
in decision-making. Women were excluded from the peace negotiations
in Arusha, until we got international support and the facilitator
Nelson Mandela to adopt our cause, and as a result our representatives
were able to make recommendations to the negotiation process. The
peace accord that was signed was gender-sensitive, but we have had
to struggle to make political parties implement it in a gender sensitive
manner, including by integrating women into the decision-making
in the electoral process.
In 2005, we lobbied successfully in the constitutional reform process
to get a quota of 30 percent women represented in parliament, the
senate, and government. We are now aiming for 50% and we also want
the quota to apply to the local government level. We are pleased
to have a number of women in decision-making, and we hope that it
will make a difference regarding gender-sensitive legal reform,
the protection of people facing crisis, and many other issues. We
are encouraging the elected women to report not only to their political
parties but also to women’s constituencies regarding the protection
of women and children’s rights.
PW: Have any major changes resulted from having more women in decision-making?
We haven’t seen any major changes yet because power is still
really concentrated in men’s hands, and women face many institutional
challenges to being effective actors in government. There is lack
of awareness, capacities and leadership among women in political
life. Women have been tempted to blindly follow political parties;
they have not made it to the central committee of the party and
have yet to take the lead and participate in decision-making.
It’s time for women leaders to be more active, and dynamic,
and to show that they’re there not only because of their parties,
but because women have done a lot of work to advocate, to change
the law, to ensure a quota in the constitution and to have their
numbers in the political institutions. Women have to be actors,
not just propaganda followers. But they need training and examples
from what others have done. They need support from other women and
we need to reinforce their capacities in leadership, and their self-esteem.
PW: Have you and your organization used Resolution 1325
in your work?
We’ve tried to work with all UN instruments including the
Beijing Platform, CEDAW, and Resolution 1325. We try to connect
them to the laws and policies in our country including the constitution.
The Resolution is good but we still need to make it reach a larger
population, especially the women’s groups. We need to also
have financial support to do it. Dushirehamwe wants to develop a
simpler version of the Kirundi translation of 1325 (available on
the PeaceWomen website) to make it easier to read. With the support
of UNIFEM, we’ve made small brochures and we’re looking
to make many copies and distribute them to people in understandable
language.
The most important thing is to know how to use 1325 as an advocacy
tool. We have to be mobilized at the national level. We have to
design a plan of activities around RS 1325 to make it more useful
and understandable. We need to sensitize our political leaders to
integrate the resolution as a national plan. We also need help from
women’s groups to advocate each article and explain its meaning.
We need to integrate RS 1325 into our national and local laws.
PW: How can UN, through institutions like the Integrated
Mission in Burundi and the new Peacebuilding Commission support
women in Burundi?
Burundians have achieved a lot of things. We’ve achieved peace
at a certain level but the UN can play a vital role in pushing our
government to implement a broad idea of peace that includes physical
security, economic opportunities and the freedom to speak, to move
and to act.
We hope the new PBC can help with the development of strong solutions
for peace, security, reconciliation, and recovery including the
economic empowerment of women, and the promotion of laws that are
gender-sensitive.
The PBC should make sure that gender issues are brought into the
government’s agenda. Women have done a lot - they should not
be excluded at this crucial moment. Women must be seen not only
as beneficiaries but also as stakeholders in the process of peace
building.
We hope that there will be gender expertise within the national-level
PBC processes. Right now the national committee on the PBC is composed
only of men. But women are 54 percent of the population and have
the credibility and capacities to contribute. All those facts have
to be recalled as we call upon the commission to integrate women
as stakeholders.
For women, a major priority is security. Reform of the security
system should take into account women’s needs. Gender desks
in different parts of the security sector should be established.
Judicial and protection mechanisms can play a critical role for
women who are facing gender-based violence. Sometimes when women
go to the police to report sexual violence they are told to prove
it but we know that gender based violence is not only physical harm
but also a matter of dignity, and yet they are asking you to prove
that you’ve been violated! But if there is a woman in the
system, at least she may understand what’s happening. We need
to make the security system gender sensitive so that women can be
free to speak out and have confidence.
Also we have campaigned to have stronger punishments for those who
are involved in rape. There have been some legal improvements but
we still need something strong, that punishes perpetrators and provides
women with physical and psychological care.
Another big challenge is land access and ownership. People who are
coming back from refugee camps have found their lands occupied.
This issue is a priority because in our country, land is the most
important thing people have. We’re also campaigning for laws
that give women right to land but the government doesn’t seem
to understand. Much more dialogue is needed on this issue to see
what is good for both men and women.
The commission should also support legal reform and mechanisms for
truth and reconciliation. It’s very important to know what
happened during the conflict, who was responsible and how they can
be punished. It’s important to end impunity but it is also
important to promote forgiveness. We’re already proud of our
national policy which calls upon the Burundian people to reconcile.
One thing that can really help to build peace in our country is
a poverty reduction fund, which takes into account security, good
governance, reconciliation and education. That is the most urgent
recommendation I would like to make to the PBC. Poverty is the main
cause of conflict in Burundi. In fact right now the country is facing
a crisis of food insecurity due to heavy rainfall that has destroyed
crops. We need urgent humanitarian help with this - many people
are fleeing again to Tanzania and Rwanda.
PW: Can you share any lessons from your Advocacy strategies and
their impact?
We have learnt the need to have a very clear goals, to identify
challenges, show our achievements and specific things we want to
change. In my country I always ask people where exactly they want
to go. Instead of just saying we need to have gender mainstreaming,
we must look at issues specifically and thematically.
There are many challenges. For example a woman, in my country takes
a very long time deciding if she wants to stand in elections. Once
she decides to do it, she needs support and encouragement from other
women, not criticism. This something I’ve seen among women
who don’t give support to those who are going to take the
lead. Also, if a woman wants to take a political role, she needs
the support of her family and relatives. In African countries, that
can be difficult.
I think our work has had some impact. We started as a small project
with UNIFEM but later we became a local organization. We are independent,
we have laws, and staff. But UNIFEM has been supportive and we’ve
gained many partnerships with other NGOs. Many women leaders have
benefited from our training program and people have started to affirm
that we’re doing something. I recently met a woman parliamentarian
who said that “thank you! With your training program, you
see where I am now!”
Also when I traveled to different parts of the country, people have
said, “you know, after the meeting with the other ethnic group,
now I’m able to move, to grow my crops, and we’re helping
each other to build houses. I can talk to my neighbors and we do
things together.” I’m happy for that; I feel I’m
helping. But the support of my family is very important to me- my
own husband is very supportive. He takes time to understand my work
and calls me when I am traveling to ask how I’m doing. Women
do need this type of support to work.
We are also in need of financial support for our programs in conflict
transformation, peace building, and women’s political participation.
PW: What are your hopes for Burundi’s future?
Burundi is emerging from a very bad crisis. We have had to start
rebuilding everything from the community level. Our hope is that
peace will prevail and international and regional actors will support
us. One good sign is that the leaders of the Great Lakes region
countries have recently signed a pact which may help guarantee peace
in the countries of region.
As for the work of the PBC, it will only fulfill Burundians expectations,
if it is conducted in a transparent and participatory manner, giving
Burundian’s ownership of the peacebuilding process, but ensuring
partnership between UN agencies, government bodies and civil society.
Our hope is that because our leaders now are young, they may have
fresh ideas. For example, the current president set up free primary
education, and a program of medical care for young children and
women. These are programs that can improve life if they are really
supported.
There is also the civil disarmament issue, which is critical because
many civilians are armed and use weapons for violence and robbery.
Implementing the policy of disarming civilians is not easy but since
the last rebel group agreed to sign a ceasefire, there is hope for
that as well.
Its true that Burundi has achieved a lot, but we still have a long
way to go. With the international community behind us, I think we
can make changes that will ensure a better future.
|