Report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of Security Council resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014) and 2191 (2014) (S/2015/962)

Friday, December 11, 2015
PeaceWomen Consolidated Themes: 
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Security Council Agenda Geographical Topic: 
Document PDF: 

Report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of Security Council resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014) and 2191 (2014) (S/2015/962)

Code: S/2015/962

Period of Time and Topic: This report by the Secretary-General is on the humanitarian situation in Syria, pursuant to Security Council resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014), and 2191 (2014). The Secretary-General’s report gives account on major developments in Syria, including both political/military and humanitarian aspects, and recognizes that the situation continues to be defined by the parties’ “widespread disregard for international humanitarian law and the obligation of all parties to protect civilians.”[1]

Women, Peace and Security

While the report gives detailed account on human rights violations against civilians from both the Syrian government and non-state armed groups, and informs on humanitarian provisions and protection of civilian measures, it does not apply a gender lens to consider how women are specifically affected by the deteriorating security and humanitarian situation. The report does not include any specific references to the WPS agenda (such as mentions of WPS resolutions), and only sporadically reports on women casualties (precisely in two instances) and women’s human rights abuses, including women being detained by ISIL elements for allegedly violating the ISIL-imposed dress code or adultery.[2]  The prevalence of sexual and gender-based violence is only mentioned once when accounting for the grave human rights violations inside government detention centers.[3] Regarding the humanitarian response, the report accounts for the delivery of “reproductive health services and services relating to gender-based violence to around 102,000 people per month on average” by UNFPA partner organizations.[4] Given these very limited references to the situation of women, which has not seen any improvements compared to the last reporting periods, one can assume the continuance of an overall unawareness for the importance of gender-sensitive reporting to assess how women, men, girls and boys are affected differently and to cater to their specific security and humanitarian needs.

References in Need of Improvement and Missed Opportunities

Reporting on women’s concerns in accordance with the WPS agenda could have been stronger on several occasions.

Political Process

In its mention of the local agreements being negotiated between government and non-state armed opposition groups[5] as well as meetings of these groups and the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces umbrella group to discuss the outcomes of the Vienna process,[6] the report fails to mention whether women representatives were part of these processes to ensure that women’s voices are heard in any decision-making process regarding conflict resolution. It further misses the opportunity to call for civil society’s participation, including women’s civil society organizations, in the implementation of the Action Group for Syria Final Communiqué and the Vienna Statements.[7] Considering that civilians, including women, and civilian infrastructure continue to deliberately targeted, ensuring women’s participation in all decision-making processes is crucial as only a gender-balanced view on the deteriorating political, security and humanitarian situation on the ground can ensure that the varying needs of women, men, girls and boys are adequately addressed.

Humanitarian support

The report would have highly benefited from commenting on whether any of the UN agencies or partner organizations, including WFP, WHO, UNICEF and UNHCR, had conducted gender-sensitive needs assessments to identify whether and how women are affected differently in order to effectively tailor humanitarian assistance to their needs. Additionally, information on whether local civil society organizations, particularly women’s civil society, were consulted in the design and implementation of delivery mechanisms for humanitarian assistance would have been desirable.

In its mention of the continuous challenges regarding humanitarian access, including administrative difficulties in obtaining visas[8], the report would have been stronger if it had specified whether organizations working on women’s health issues, including reproductive health and family planning provisions, face additional challenges or restrictions. Ideally, the report would have included information on how to specifically cater to women’s needs such as secure access to sanitation facilities as well as hygiene and health assistance, including reproductive health, family planning and maternal health services. Further, the report would have benefited from detailing whether specific provisions have been made or are planned to assist women in hard-to-reach areas and besieged areas.[9]

In its mention of the number of international NGOs that have been authorized to partner with national humanitarian organizations, the report should have ideally included whether these include organizations that provide specific assistance to women, including women’s rights advocacy and women’s health services.[10]

Human rights

Considering the severe security situation for civilians due to continuing deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure, the report could have further specified how women are adversely affected, particularly by referring to the use of sexual and gender-based violence as a tool of war. Additionally, the report could have focused more strongly on the situation of IDPs, including references to the security concerns of displaced women and the prevalence of sexual violence in IDP camps.[11] Ideally, the report would have provided information on whether gender-sensitive provisions to ensure women’s safety are available or in the process of planning at IDP sites.

Ideal Asks for WPS transformation

Pursuant to resolution 2043 (2012), which mandates UNSMIS to monitor and support the full implementation of the Envoy’s six-point proposal (annexed to resolution 2042 (2012)) to bring an immediate end to all violence and human rights violations and securing humanitarian access; resolution 2139 (2014); and resolution 2165 (2014), future reports by the Secretary-General must reflect the Security Council’s commitment to the WPS agenda and provide updates on the implementation of gender-sensitive programming regarding both participation and protection concerns. Applying a gender lens throughout the report will ensure that all genders are adequately represented and their particular needs in regards to the severe security, political and humanitarian situation are being met.


[1] S/2015/962, para. 3

[2] S/2015/962, para. 21

[3] S/2015/962, para. 20

[4] S/2015/962, para. 24

[5] S/2015/962, para. 18

[6] S/2015/962, para. 19

[7] S/2015/962, para. 59

[8] S/2015/962, para. 39f

[9] S/2015/962, para. 30f, 42f

[10] S/2015/962, para. 40

[11] S/2015/962, para. 16