Security Council Debate on the Situation in the Middle East, Including the Palestinian Question, July 2012

Thursday, July 26, 2012


On 25 July 2012, the Security Council held an open debate on the situation in the Middle East. The discussion was primarily focused upon the two-State solution for Israeli-Palestinian peace and the Syrian crisis. The debate, which occurs on a quarterly basis, did not result in the adoption of an outcome document.

The debate featured 42 statements, including those from the Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, the Permanent Observer of Palestine to the United Nations, the Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the permanent and non-permanent members of the Security Council, and 22 other member states. As is often true with discussions on this topic, there was little attention paid to the gendered dimension of the situation in the Middle East: only 5 out of 42, or 12%, of statements referenced gender.

Gender Analysis

The debate was largely inattentive to the gender-specific impact of the situation in the Middle East. However, a few speakers did emphasize the need to protect women and children from the violence occurring in the region. Australia stressed that civilians—especially women and children—bear the brunt of the violence in Syria and must remain in the forefront of discussions as the international community aims to create a solution. Similarly, the Non-Aligned Movement drew attention to the “violent actions by Israeli settlers against…Palestinian civilians, including women and children.”

The debate's most gender-conscious statement was delivered by the Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, who highlighted the crucial relationship between women, peace, and security. The Chairman noted that, in working towards the shared goal of a two-state solution, the Committee has held meetings to focus on the role of women in support of peace. It is disappointing that the Chairman was the only speaker to address women's ability to positively impact Middle East peace processes. Speakers could have used this debate as a forum to discuss women's crucial participation in the region's reconciliatory talks; their failure to do so is an upsetting missed opportunity.

General Analysis

The debate predominantly focused on the prospect of Israeli-Palestinian peace. In observation of this past month's efforts to restart talks between the two parties, Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process Robert Serry noted that the deliberations had “not reached a breaking point, but there had not been a breakthrough either.” The debate broached several contentious topics including: the release of Palestinian prisoners, Israel's settlement activity, the recent terrorist attack targeting tourists in Bulgaria, and the blockade on Gaza. In response to these issues, most speakers reaffirmed support for a two-State solution and called for the reconvening of direct negotiations.

Israel argued that the debate's focus on its relations with Palestine diverted attention from other core challenges to the region. Listing a catalogue of human rights abuses that occur in Iran, Palestine, and Lebanon, Israel urged speakers to stop using discussion of Israel to “sweep these important issues under the carpet.”

However, contrary to Israel's assertion, many speakers also discussed the situation in Syria. France and the United States condemned the Council's failure to appropriately respond to the Syrian crisis, reprimanding Russia and China for using their veto power to halt effectual action. Arguing that that the Assad regime had lost legitimacy by terrorizing the Syrian people, Canada advocated for universal and binding sanctions to pressure the President to honor his commitments. Several other speakers reiterated this call for action and offered support for Special Envoy Annan's Six-Point Plan. Ultimately, as Pakistan stressed, political will is needed to work towards peace in the Middle East.


States represented at the debate included: Australia, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, France, Germany, Guatemala, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela.

UN and civil society representatives at the debate included: Special Coordinator for Middle East Peace Process Robert Serry, the Permanent Observer of Palestine to the United Nations, the European Union, the Non-Aligned Movement, and the Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.

*Bolded speakers referenced gender.


Press Release: Open Debate on the Situation in the Middle East

Please choose

  • Speaker

    The Non-Aligned Movement
  • Extracts

    Specific measures are necessary to address, in particular, the grave impact of Israel's settlement policies on the Palestinian people and their land, including the violent actions by Israeli settlers against Palestinian property and Palestinian civilians, including women and children, as well as provocations and incitement, including against holy sites in occupied East Jerusalem and the vandalizing of mosques and churches.

Human Rights
  • Country

  • Extracts

    I am sure we will hear the same old criticisms of Israeli policies, but very little about the core challenges facing our region. The United Nations Development Programme has sponsored five Arab human development reports since 2002. The reports reveal the crippling deficits of freedom, educational opportunities and women's empowerment that have long afflicted the Arab world. I ask: Is Israel responsible for the fact that gays are hunted down and hanged in Iran; that bloggers in the West Bank are jailed by the Palestinian Authority; that artists in Lebanon are ruthlessly censored by their Government; or that women in Gaza are arrested and tortured for daring to leave the house without a headscarf? Are we responsible for the Christians and other minorities who are fleeing the Middle East these days in droves because Islamic extremists attack their communities? Is Israel responsible for the fact that 25 per cent of Arab young people are unemployed and that many others are desperate to find a decent job? Maybe it is time to stop using Israel in this debate to sweep such important issues under the carpet. It is certainly time to finally deal openly and honestly with the basic deficits that cripple the Middle East.