Scorecard of [United Kingdom] [2019]-01-01 00:00:00

United Kingdom 2019
78.6

International Actions

73.3%
Security Council Actions

93.8%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in All Security Council Open Debates

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 15 out of 16 Open Debates in 2019 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security:  4/16

Conflict Prevention:  3/16

Disarmament:  2/16

Displacement and Humanitarian Response:  2/16

Participation: 4/16

Peace Processes: 3/16

Peacekeeping: 2/16

Protection: 2/16

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 1/16

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 3/16

Implementation: 2/16

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 11/16

Human Rights: 1/16

On average the UK covered 20 % of WPS concepts in the open debates in 2019. While the UK had the most number of references to the PeaceWomen theme ‘Justice,Rule of Law, SSR,’ amongst the P5, they also lacked a nuanced understanding of ways to tackle terrorism and organized crime in relation to the rule of law. Moreover, the UK also made some references to the implementation of WPS and participation of women. 

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of all Security Council open debates per year.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020.

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Threats Caused by Terrorist Acts

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 2 out of 2 Open Debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts in 2019 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security:  0/2

Conflict Prevention:  1/2

Disarmament:  0/2

Displacement and Humanitarian Response:  0/2

Participation: 0/2

Peace Processes: 0/2

Peacekeeping: 0/2

Protection: 0/2

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/2

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 0/2

Implementation: 0/2

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 1/2

Human Rights: 1/2

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020. 

0.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Maintenance of International Peace and Security

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 0 out of 1 Open Debates on the maintenance of international peace and security in 2019 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/1

Conflict Prevention: 0/1

Disarmament: 0/1

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/1

Participation: 0/1

Peace Processes: 0/1

Peacekeeping: 0/1

Protection: 0/1

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/1

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 0/1

Implementation: 0/1

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 0/1

Human Rights: 0/1

The focus of this debate was on disasters related to climate, and the UK failed to mention the gendered impact of climate change, the need for participation of women in climate-related decision making or reference the WPS agenda which highlights the linkages between climate change and conflict. 

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the maintenance of international peace and security.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020.

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 1 out of 1 Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians in 2019 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/1

Conflict Prevention: 0/1

Disarmament: 0/1

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/1

Participation: 0/1

Peace Processes: 0/1

Peacekeeping: 1/1

Protection: 1/1

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/1

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 0/1

Implementation: 0/1

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 1/1

Human Rights: 0/1

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the protection of civilians.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020.

100.0%
The Use of Veto

CriteriaA state should not apply its veto right.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

The UK exercised its right to veto draft resolutions in zero out of a total of six instances of veto application. 

Comment

N/A.

Methodology100% - No veto right was used;
75% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
50% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
25% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language);
0% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language).
Resources

1. Veto List, The United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed July 31, 2020. 

46.2%
Commitments Intended to Strengthen the Implementation of the WPS Agenda

CriteriaAll WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered in the WPS commitments.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisIn its statements made at the 2019 Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security, the United Kingdom covered the following WILPF/PeaceWomen themes:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

The United Kingdom was the only Permanent Five country to make new commitments in 2019, which are as follows: 

Financial commitments: The United Kingdom commits to promote women’s meaningful participation in peace processes and have allocated GBP 300,000 of funding to this area of work. The countries of focus - although not exclusively - include Afghanistan, South Sudan and Yemen, where the UK will Uruguay press for women’s needs, concerns and priorities to be taken into consideration at all levels - from the community to the negotiating table and beyond.

 The UK will also commit to increase support for women working to resolve conflict, counter violent extremism and build peace at the local level, and commit GBP 800,000 to the Women’s Peace and Humanitarian Fund over the next year. 

The UK also reaffirms its commitment to supporting the role of women in peacekeeping, pledging GBP 1 million to the Elsie Initiative for Uniformed Women in Peace Operations, to support and incentivize more meaningful participation of uniformed women in UN peace operations, and accelerate the much-needed progress towards achieving UN targets. 

Civil Society Engagement: Commit to reinforce the vital role of civil society by consulting with civil society groups on the UK’s nine National Action Plan focus countries. These consultations are essential to understanding the needs of stakeholders, including survivors of conflict-related sexual violence.

Security Sector: The UK will redouble efforts to advance the Women Peace and Security agenda through the UK military. This will include: providing relevant training to at least 100 UK and international military every year; identifying and training military Gender and Protection Advisers; analyzing the prevalence of sexual violence in areas in which the UK military operate, and stepping up training for women officers. 

Conflict-Related Sexual Violence: The UK is working with the Institute for International Criminal Investigations and Nadia’s Initiative to develop the Murad Code, an ethical code of conduct that aims to ensure that survivors of sexual violence give informed consent regarding evidence gathering and that they are referred to support services safely and confidentially. The UK is seeking to see the Code incorporated into all donor funding requirements and will invite Member States to sign up when the UK launches it at PSVI International Conference in London in November.

MethodologyThe number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes emphasised in a statement identifies the final percentage received by a state
Resources
  1. "Call to Action on 2015 Commitments" [homepage, where commitments for years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 are located], WILPF, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020. 

  2. WPS Commitments,” UN Women, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2020. 

 

90.0%
Women, Peace and Security Financing

90.0%
Balance Between UN Women Total Contribution and Arms Sales Revenue

CriteriaTotal contribution to UN Women should increase overtime while Arms Sales Revenue should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

UN Women Contribution increased; Arms Transfer Revenue decreased. 

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2019: $16,220,000

Arms Transfer Revenue, Total Contribution in 2019: $377,000,000

Military Expenditure in 2019: $ 48.7 billion 

The UK marginally increased their contribution to UN Women in 2019, and in that same year there was a  reduction of arms transfer revenue as a result of decreases in its arms exports to Saudi Arabia, India and the USA. However, according to SIPRI, the UK was the world’s sixth-largest arms exporter from 2015 to 2019, and it accounted for 3.7 percent of global arms exports.  The UK is also ranked 8th on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's list of global military spenders. 

 

Comment

Arms Transfer Revenue, Total Contribution in 2018: $ 518,000,000  

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2018:  $15,940,000 

Military Expenditure in 2018:  $ 50,000,000,000

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the arms transfer revenue and the UN Women contribution, etc.):
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (90-100%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (79-89%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (68-78%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (57-67%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (46-56%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (35-45%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (24-34%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (13-23%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (0-12%).
Resources
  1. "Core Resources: Top 25 Donors," UN Women, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

  2. "Arms Transfers and Military Spending," Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

  3. "Importer/Exporter TIV Tables," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

  4. "Trends in World Military Expenditure," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

  5. "Trends in International Arms Transfers," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

88.0%
International Gender and Human Rights Indicators

86.2%
Ranking via Gender Inequality Index (GII)

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Inequality Index (GII).
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom was ranked 27 among 189 participating countries in 2019.
Comment

In 2018, the UK was ranked 27 of 189 countries. 

Researcher’s Note: The figures used above are from the 2019 Human Development Report which has the rankings for 2018. The 2020 Human Development Report is not published as of October 2020. Consultations have been scheduled till December 2020 and “the work on the 2020 HDR will continue through the summer and fall”.

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "Human Development Reports: Table 5: Gender Inequality Index," The United Nations Development Programme, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020. 

 

86.8%
Ranking via Global Gender Gap Index

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Gap Index.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom was ranked 21 among 153 participating countries in 2019.
Comment

In 2018, the United Kingdom was ranked 15 among 149 participating countries.​

Researcher’s note: In 2019, WEF published the Gender Gap Report 2020 instead of a Gender Gap Report 2019. This was done to change the launch of their Gender Gap Report series to the first quarter of every year. The above-mentioned data reflects the rank tabulated using sources from 2019 as indicated in the report (see resource 1).  

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2020," The World Economic Forum, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

2.The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018,” The World Economic Forum, 2018. Accessed August 13, 2020.

90.9%
Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties

CriteriaA state ratifies all international human rights gender-sensitive treaties.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom has signed and possibly ratified the following International Human Rights Treaties in 2019:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - signed
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - signed
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - signed
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - ratified
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - signed
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - ratified
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - signed
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - ratified
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - signed
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - ratified
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - signed
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - ratified
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - signed
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - ratified
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - signed
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - ratified
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - signed
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - ratified
Arms Trade Treaty - signed
Arms Trade Treaty - ratified
Comment

Researcher’s Note: The UK has acceded to Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: 2000. 

Methodology100% is received by a state that has signed and ratified all International Human Rights Treaties. Ratification of a treaty provides a state with a full point; a signature (without ratification) provides a state with half of a point.
11 - 99-100%;
10 - 90%;
9 - 81%;
8 - 72%;
7 - 63%;
6 - 54%;
5 - 45%;
4 - 36%;
3 - 27%;
2 - 18%;
1 - 9%;
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "The Yearbook of the United Nations, 1948-1949: Part I, Section V.: Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Questions," pp. 529-530, The United Nations Department of Public Information, 1950. Accessed August 13, 2020. 

  1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1976; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1976; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: 1981; Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: 2000: "Status of Ratification: Interactive Dashboard," United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 2014. Accessed August 13, 2020.

  1. "Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

  1. "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

  1. "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

  1. "Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war," The United Nations, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

  1. Additional Protocol II: "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977," International Committee of the Red Cross, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020. 

  2. Arms Trade Treaty: "Arms Trade Treaty," United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2020.

59.4%
Peacekeeping Operations

18.7%
Contribution of Troops, Police and Military Experts

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in peacekeeping.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom provided 54 women out of 579 peacekeepers in 2019.
Comment

Contingent: 501 men, 50 women, 551 total 

Experts on Mission: 3 men, 0 women, 3 total 

Staff: 21 men, 4 women, 25 total 

Total peacekeepers provided: 525 men, 54 women, 579 total 

A majority of the UK peacekeepers are present in the UN mission in South Sudan (303), followed by the mission in Cyprus (258). 

Researcher’s Note: While all the Permanent Five countries focus on peacekeeping as an important element of the WPS agenda and to tackle sexual violence in conflict settings,  WILPF believes that to fully prevent all forms of sexual violence it is rather essential to address the root causes of violence, including structural inequalities, discrimination and patriarchal norms. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in peacekeeping, a state that ensures 50% of its personnel are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a score that depends on the percentage of female personnel contributed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Data is provided by the United Nations (Department of Peacekeeping Operations).
Resources
  1. "Contributors to UN Peacekeeping Operations by Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping, 2019. Accessed August 14, 2020.  

  1. "Summary of Contributions to Peacekeeping by Mission, Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping, 2019. Accessed August 14, 2020. 

  2. Summary of Military and Police Personnel by country and post,” United Nations Peacekeeping, 2019. Accessed November 9, 2020.  

100.0%
Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) Allegedly Committed by Peacekeepers

CriteriaThere should be a "zero tolerance" policy with respect to sexual exploitation and abuse.
Note*: Information on SEA is gathered based on publicly available information. Official statistics are available starting from 2015.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Total number of allegations in 2019: 80 

UK  peacekeepers involved: 0

Comment

The UK has always positioned itself as a leader in fighting SEA. In 2019, the UK spent £ 3.8 million to tackle SEA in international peacekeeping. However, a recent report from the Independent Commission for Aid Impact states that the UK’s efforts to tackle SEA committed by peacekeepers is not doing enough to support victims and survivors. 

While the UN recorded 80 allegations of sexual abuse in 2019 mostly in Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo, there are many cases that go unreported. 

MethodologyIn line with the UN "zero tolerance" policy, at least one allegation of sexual abuse provides a state with 0%.
states that have not been involved in the SEA allegations receives 100%.
Resources
  1. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Allegations," The United Nations, 2018. Accessed  August 14, 2020. [To obtain total # of allegations.] 

  1. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Alleged Perpetrators," The United Nations, 2018. Accessed August 14, 2020. [To obtain total # of perpetrators.] 

  2. UK not doing enough to support survivors of peacekeeping abuse, report says,” Devex, September 2020. Accessed November 19, 2020. 

National Actions

56.2%
Prevention

80.0%
Partnership Between Womens Civil Society Organisations and the Government

CriteriaThere should be a funded and governmentally-supported women's civil society landscape.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

The United Kingdom receives  80%  because: While there was financial support and active collaboration between the government and CSOs, 2019 was marked with limited engagement with CSOs, due to: the passage of laws such as the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act that affects the work of aid workers; government departments also treat CSOs as suppliers rather than stakeholders; most UK government departments, including the DFID, face capacity constraints which hinder them from meaningfully engaging with CSOs. 

 Researcher’s note: There is lack of recent data available on government funding and engagement with CSOs. 

Comment

Government Funding and Engagement with Women's CSO.The NCVO’s recent UK Civil Society Almanac states that £ 15.7 billion for UK charities’ income came from the central government in 2017-2018. However, the public continues to be the largest source of income for the charity organizations, making up 47% of their total income of £ 53.5 billion in 2017-2018. The UK Government released a civil society strategy in 2018, while it was broadly welcomed by charities, most civil society organizations also believe that more can be done to implement the objectives laid out in the strategy. 

Spotlight: The Gender Action for Peace and Security (GAPS) is a membership organization of NGOs in the field of humanitarian response, human rights, development and peacebuilding that make up the UK’s Women, Peace and Security civil society network. Using a collaborative advocacy approach, campaigning and research, GAPS works to highlight “the realities of women living in conflict-affected countries to decision-makers and practitioners and to promote their participation at all levels.”In 2019, the UK Government funded GAPS and its partners to undertake consultations on Women, Peace and Security to mark the 20th anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 in 2020. 

MethodologyWhen there is both financial support from the government and active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 80% to 100% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is either only financial support from the government or only active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 60% to 79% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and where there are no restrictions applied on womens organisation, a state receives from 40% to 59% depending on circumstances (i.e.: kinds of services provided by civil society, etc.);

When there is neither both financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when government provides services for women, a state receives from 20% to 39% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when there are several restrictions on civil society, a state receives from 0% to 19% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.).
Resources
  1. The UK Civil Society Almanac 2020,” NCVO, 2020. Accessed September 10, 2020. 

  2. Civil Society Strategy: What NGOs need to know,” Bond, 2018. Accessed September 10, 2020. 

  3. Empty commitments: is the UK Government engaging with civil society?”, Bond, 2019. Accessed September 10, 2020. 

  4. One year on from the civil society strategy, charities say it's time for some action,” Civil Society, 2019. Accessed September 10, 2020. 

  5. Who We Are,” GAPS UK. Accessed September 10, 2020. 

 

 

60.0%
Special Gender-Specific Training of Security and Law Enforcement Personnel

CriteriaSpecial gender-specific training for law enforcement and security sector should exist.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom implemented the following training standards in 2019:
Assessment of gender-sensitive training is present
Overall training objective is gender sensitive
Gender parity among trainers and trainees
Women's organisations or gender-related societal leaders are engaged to provide contextual perspective on gender within the security sector
Follow-up communication and gender-related knowledge dissemination methods are established
Comment

The UK law enforcement and security sector has released diversity and inclusion strategies to implement gender-specific training in 2019, with clarity on the accountability and responsibility to implement the strategies. However, diversity continues to be an issue in the UK police force with only 6.9% police officers from minority ethnic groups. Moreover, with women being underrepresented at senior levels, there is also a clear imbalance of power between men and women in the UK police force.

MethodologyThe criteria is determined in line with the UN Women guidelines (developed in partnership with the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) and the European Union).
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. The National Police Chiefs’ Council Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Strategy: 2018-2025,” The National Police Chiefs’ Council and Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, 2018. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  2. Inclusion and Diversity Strategy 2017-2021,” Metropolitan Police Service. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  3. Police Diversity: ‘Why Join a Force of People you Mistrust?," BBC, August 2020. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  4. Police Workforce,” UK Government, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  5. Police Service Strength,” House of Commons, 2020. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  6. Gender Equality in UK Policing Annual Report 2019,” HeForShe, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

84.6%
National Action Plan on the Implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325 bases on WPS Themes

CriteriaA state has implemented a 1325 National Action Plan. All WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom implements UNSC Resolution 1325 and covers following Peacewomen Themes 2019:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

UK's fourth NAP is adopted for the period 2018-2022, however, it does not provide specific timeframes for the outcomes it describes. The NAP is externally-focussed; in particular, it strengthens opportunities for local women civil society to initiate partnerships that address local needs in the UK’s efforts to build security and stability abroad. However, important issues such as the impact of gendered violence within the country, immigration, and status of women in Northern Ireland remains unaddressed in the NAP. 

NAP Budget. There is no estimated or allocated budget in the 2018-2022 NAP. In explaining this decision, the UK stated that it found "...little evidence that a ring fenced funding pool would significantly improve the UK’s delivery of WPS initiatives compared to other measures such as ensuring that WPS is strategically and meaningful mainstreamed throughout programming.” In accordance with this view, the UK Government departments fund work on WPS from their core budgets, such as the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s Global Britain Fund, and cross-government funds including the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund. 

Disarmament. The updated UK NAP for 2018-2022 has no references to small arms and light weapons (SALW). While the NAP refers many times to the entrenchment of harmful gender norms and its impact on women’s lives, disarmament and the impact of arms on women in conflict is not mentioned in this NAP. 

MethodologyThe grade is determined on the basis of a number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes that are emphasized in a 1325 National Action Plan (NAP). A NAP that emphasizes all WILPF/PeaceWomen themes receives 100%.
Resources
  1. “National Action Plan: UK”, PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  2. UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security 2018 - 2022”, HM Government, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  3. "UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security 2018 - 2022: Annual Report to Parliament 2019," HM Government, December 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020.

 

0.0%
Balance between the 1325 National Action Plan (NAP) Budget and Military Expenditure.

CriteriaThe 1325 National Action Plan budget should increase overtime while military expenditure should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

As the United Kingdom’s fourth National Action Plan (released in 2018) does not include a WPS budget, the United Kingdom receives a 0%.  Even though the various UK government departments fund WPS work from their core budgets, the NAP does not state an overall estimated budget for the strategic outcomes it describes, which could be a major gap in the full implementation of the NAP. 

In 2019, the United Kingdom’s military expenditure was $ 48.7 billion.

Comment

In 2018, the United Kingdom’s military expenditures were approximately $50 billion ($49,997,000,000). The United Kingdom was among the top military spenders of 2018. 

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the NAP budget and military expenditure, etc.):

NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure decreases (90-100%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure does not change (79-89%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure decreases (68-78%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure does not change (57-67%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure decreases (46-56%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure increases (35-45%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure does not change (24-34%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure increases (13-23%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure increases (1-12%)
No NAP/No NAP Budget (0%)
Resources
  1. "Arms Transfers and Military Spending," Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2019. Accessed August 12, 2020. 

  2. “National Action Plan: UK”, PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  3. UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security 2018 - 2022”, HM Government, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020. 

  4. UK Defence in Numbers 2019,” Ministry of Defence, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2020

 

67.1%
Participation

64.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Parliament

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in Parliament.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women made up 32% of the House of Commons (the Lower House) in the United Kingdom in 2019.  The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men in its Lower House, therefore achieving a score of 64%.

The UK’s parliament, elected in 2019, has 220 women and 50 members who are openly LGBTQ. However, only 35 Members of Parliament were women of colour.

Comment

In 2019, women made up 26.4% of the United Kingdom's Upper House (the House of Lords). 

The proportion of women in the House of Commons and the House of Lords remained stagnant from 2018. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in Parliament, a state that ensures 50% of its parliamentarians are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female parliamentarians employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

1.  “Monthly Ranking of Women in National Parliaments”, Inter Parliamentary Union Parline, December 2019. Accessed August 19, 2020.

2. “Global and Regional Averages of Women in National Parliaments”, Inter Parliamentary Union Parline, December 2019. Accessed August 19, 2020. 

3. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2020", The World Economic Forum, 2019. Accessed August 19, 2020.

4. “The UK’s new parliament is its most diverse ever,” Quartz, 2019. Accessed December 1, 2020. 

 

43.4%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Ministerial Positions

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in ministerial positions.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

21.7% of ministerial positions were held by women in the United Kingdom in 2019, falling short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men. The United Kingdom, therefore, receives a score of  43.4%

Comment

In 2018, 31% of ministerial positions were held by women in the United Kingdom.

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the ministerial positions, a state that ensures 50% of its ministers are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female ministers employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources
  1.  "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2020", The World Economic Forum, 2019. Accessed August 19, 2020.

  2. Women in Parliament and Government, House of Commons Library, 2020. Accessed September 9, 2020. 

60.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Law Enforcement

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in law enforcement
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

30% of law enforcement positions were held by women in the United Kingdom in 2019. The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men, therefore achieving a score of 60%. 

Comment

There were 37,428 women police officers in the 43 police forces on 31 March 2019, making up 30% of police officers in England and Wales (the highest proportion on record).   The number of women officers increased by 1,010 (3%) compared with a year earlier, and the proportion of women police officers also increased slightly (up 0.6 percentage points from 29.8% 0n 31 March 2018). 

 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in law enforcement, a state that ensures 50% of its law enforcement agents are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female law enforcement agents employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources
  1. "Statistical Bulletin: Police Workforce: England and Wales," The Home Office, Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2020.

  2. Police Workforce,” Her Majesty’s Government, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2020.  

64.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Judiciary

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in the judiciary.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

32% of judges in the United Kingdom were women in 2019. The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men, therefore achieving a score of 64%.

17% of the UK’s Supreme Court justices are women, however, since its formation in 2009, there has never been a Supreme Court judge who is a person of colour.

Comment

32% of court judges and 46% of tribunal judges were women, representing a 3% increase in the court judges category from 2018. 

Notably, younger age groups had higher levels of women's representation. Almost half of the court judges under 40 were women (47%), and almost half (46%) of court judges aged 40-49 were women. Women accounted for half of the most senior roles in tribunals (Presidents, Chamber Presidents, Deputy and Vice Presidents). Nearly 43% of the tribunal judges under 40 were women and over half of the tribunal judges between 40-49 were women. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the judiciary, a state that ensures 50% of its judges are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female judges employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources
  1. Judicial Diversity Statistics 2019”, Ministry of Justice, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2020. 

  2. Lady Hale: at least half of UK Judiciary should be female,” The Guardian, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2020. 

  3. Gender and Power: UK women still ‘under-represented in top jobs,” Al Jazeera, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2019. 

 

72.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Labour Force

CriteriaWomen should have equal access to employment opportunities.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women's  rate of participation in the labour force was 72.8%, a 0.6% increase from 2018. (Men's participation, 82.2% in 2019, decreased marginally from 2018 by 0.2%.)

Comment

The following figures provide additional insight into women’s participation, standing and experience within the labour force in the United Kingdom in 2019: 

  • The estimated earned income per year (US$): $ 29,100 for women; $51,800 for men.   
  • Legislators, senior officials and managers: 36.3 % for women; 63.7 % for men.
  • Professional and technical workers: 49.8% for women; 50.3 % for men.
MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) on the basis of its methodology.
Resources
  1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," World Economic Forum, 2018. Accessed August 19, 2020. 
  2. The Global Gender Gap Report: 2020,” World Economic Forum, 2019. Accessed August 19, 2020.

99.4%
Access to Education

CriteriaThere should be equal access to all levels of education.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Enrolment in primary education: 99.4 % girls; 99.6% boys. 

Enrolment in secondary education: 97.2 % girls; 97% boys. 

Literacy rate: 99% girls; 99% boys.

Comment

Girls’ enrolment in secondary education declined marginally from 2018 by 0.3% for girls and by 0.2% for boys. 

Girls’ enrolment in primary education declined marginally (0.8%) from 2018, and boys enrolment also declined by 0.6%. Boys and girls’ literacy rate remained the same and consistent with 2018. 

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) and UNESCO, developed on the basis of their respective methodologies.
Resources
  1. The Global Gender Gap Report: 2020,” World Economic Forum, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2020.

  2. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," World Economic Forum, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2020. 

100.0%
Protection

100.0%
Presence of Gendered Perspective in Legal Framework

CriteriaGender should be mainstreamed throughout legal framework in accordance with the international law.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis Legal framework in the United Kingdom includes the following gender-sensitive laws and constitutional provisions in 2019:
Women and men are guaranteed the rights to vote, to hold public office, and to exercise public functions
Gender perspective incorporated into the constitution
Women and men are guaranteed the right to non-discrimination in education, employment and economic, and social activities
Women and men are guaranteed full equality in civil and business matters
Women and men are guaranteed equal rights and obligations with regard to choice of spouse, parenthood, personal rights, and command over property
Women and men are guaranteed reproductive rights
Women and men are guaranteed equal pay for equal work
Women and men are guaranteed the right to live lives free from violence
Gender sensitive laws and constitutional previsions
Comment

The United Kingdom has no single constitutional document, and is instead the sum of laws and principles that make up the "unwritten" constitution of the United Kingdom. The Constitution guarantees equal treatment based on gender, as well as provisions for potential positive action based on gender. The UK’s Equality Act 2010 is the primary legal instrument for equality which bans unfair treatment and helps to achieve equal opportunities in all aspects as it binds together previous legislation on equality and anti-discrimination. The regulations (2017/172) added in 2017 to the Equality Act 2010 provided a standard mechanism for companies to report and publish details on gender pay gap. 

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 lays out the process by which a person can legally change their gender, however, it is a bureaucratic and difficult process. While the UK government in 2018 ordered a 16 week consultation to review the act, it has not resulted in any progressive amendments so far rather the government backtracked to remove trans people’s rights to access gendered spaces, making it complicit in the global rise of transphobic violence. 

Notably, in 2018, the UK improved their legal framework on domestic abuse: Scotland passed the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act of 2018 which went into effect in April 2019, which makes all domestic abuse towards a partner, whether psychological or physical, a criminal offence. Offenders could face up to 14 years in prison.

In 2019, the UK government published a strategy refresh outlining new action for Ending Violence against Women and Girls from 2016 till 2020. Additionally, the government also published a road map and monitor to promote and track gender equality in the UK in 2019. A new bill (Gender-based Pricing Prohibition bill) to ban “differential pricing of products and services that are substantially similar other than being intended for, or marketed to, a particular gender” was introduced in the parliament in 2019.

Methodology8 - 100%
7 - 87.5%
6 - 75%
5 - 62.5%
4 - 50%
3 - 37.5%
2 - 25%
1 - 12.5%
0 - 0%

Necessary legal framework is determined in accordance with the principles of the core human rights treaties (i.e.: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)).
Resources
  1. "Government publishes landmark domestic abuse bill," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  2. Gender Equality,” UK Parliament, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  3. Here’s everything you need to know about the UK Government’s potential backtracking on trans rights,” Vogue UK, 2020. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  4. United Kingdom,” European Institute for Gender Equality. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  5. Gender-based Pricing Prohibition Bill 2019- 2021,” UK Parliament. Accessed September 16, 2020.

100.0%
Access to Justice

CriteriaWomen's unrestricted access to justice exists.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis The following protections are guaranteed by the United Kingdom in 2019:
Equal access to formal legal dispute systems and the right to legal representation
Non-discrimination law
Existence of courts and judicial bodies
Financial affordability of access to legal proceedings and/or legal aid
Free access to an interpreter during legal proceedings
Victim protection
Existence of gender units within justice institutions
Comment

According to the World Justice Project's (WJP's) 2020 report on citizens' access to justice in 2019, the United Kingdom was ranked 13 out of 128 states. As it relates to civil justice (a category which includes financial affordability, economic barriers to access and freedom from discrimination), the United Kingdom is ranked 17 out of 128. As it relates to criminal justice, the United Kingdom is ranked 12 of 128. As it relates to fundamental rights, the United Kingdom is ranked 13 of 128. In 2018, the UK’s overall ranking was 12 out of 126 states. 

In 2019, the Ministry of Justice launched a consultation to strengthen the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime (also known as the Victim’s Code), which is a statutory document that lays out the minimum level of service victims can expect from criminal justice agencies. The consultation was held in the light of victims and groups representing them felt that it lacked complexity and consistency. The Victim’s Code entitles all victims of crime to a range of support and information to help them cope and recover from the effects of the crime. 

In 2019, the UK government also held consultations on cost reform to make the judicial review more accessible, however, it ignored the financial obstacle faced by people whilst trying to exercise the right to challenge unlawful decision-making by public authorities. The legal costs rules in the UK state that for those who want to bring a judicial review must not only fund their own lawyers but also pay the state’s legal costs if they lose, making judicial review inaccessible to most people. 

MethodologyThe necessary protections represent the CEDAW standard on women's access to justice.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%"
Resources
  1. Rule of Law Index Report: 2019," The World Justice Project, 2019 [The United Kingdom, p. 151]. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  2. Rule of Law Index Report: 2020," The World Justice Project, 2020 [The United Kingdom, p. 153]. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  3. Access denied: Britain’s broken justice system, International Bar Association, 2020. Accessed September 16, 2020.

  4. New rights for victims of crime,” Ministry of Justice, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  5. The cost of access to justice,” Public Law Project, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020.

100.0%
Protections Against Human Trafficking

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 is in:
Complete compliance with the minimum standards
Partial compliance with the minimum standards
Non-compliance with the minimum standards
Comment

According to the 2019 Trafficking in Persons Report, the UK government complies with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. The government “increased funding for anti trafficking efforts; identified more potential victims; trained more first-responders to identify potential victims; increased trafficking investigations; and commissioned a parliamentary review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the Modern Slavery Act of 2015 (MSA) with input from NGOs. Although the government meets the minimum standards, protection services for child victims needed increased attention and resources”. 

MethodologyAdherence is measured in accordance with the “Palermo Protocols” and grading system developed by the US state Department’s annual report on trafficking in persons.
Full compliance: 100%
Partial Compliance: 50%
Non-Compliance: 0%

Resources
  1. 2020 Trafficking in Person Report,” The United States Department of State, 2020. Accessed September 7, 2020. [Full report]

  2. "2019 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2019. Accessed September 7, 2020. [Full report]

  3. "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime," United Nations Treaty Collection, 2020. Accessed September 7, 2020. 

100.0%
Protections Against Sexual Violence.

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of sexual violence.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 has the following services in place:
Existence of a law against sexual violence
Governmental efforts to eliminate sexual violence nationally
Existence of a national crisis hotline
Existence of women's shelters
Existence of women's rape crisis centres
Comment

In March 2016 the British Home Secretary published the UK National Strategy on Violence Against Women for the period of 2016-2020. This strategy includes 80 million GBP in funding to support rape crisis centres, shelters, and local prevention programmes. The main goals of the strategy are to increase reporting, reform the justice system's response to sexual and gender-based violence, support local commissioners, address trafficking in persons, and overall improve intervention and the prevention of abuse. This strategy was refreshed in 2019 and it contains 54 new commitments in addition to the 95 that were part of the 2016 strategy. Some of the new commitments include: increasing funding for rape support centres by 10%; gathering regular data on sexual harassment; develop guidance for supporting LGBT victims; review of criminal justice responses to rape and sexual offences. 

MethodologyThe standard is derived from the CEDAW and Istanbul Convention.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. Violence Against Women and Girls and Male Position Factsheet,” UK Home Office, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  2. "All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence report into the Funding and Commissioning of Sexual Violence and Abuse Services 2018," All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence, 2018. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  3. "Helpline Supporters," Women's Aid and Refuge, 2012. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  4. "Help after rape and sexual assault," The National Health Service, 2018. Accessed September 16, 2020.

  5. "Safe at Last: Inside a Women's Refuge," The Guardian, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

  6. "Dangerous Persons Database - ViSOR," The National Policing Improvement Agency, 2009. Accessed September 16, 2020. 

95.0%
Recovery Support

80.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes Serving the Needs of Veterans

CriteriaDedicated programmes for female veterans should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 provides the following services:
Female veterans affairs offices exist in urban and rural areas
Economic benefits (i.e. disability, housing) exist
Health service benefits (i.e. free veterans health insurance, gender-sensitive PTSD care) exist
Educational benefits exist
Employment services exist
Comment

n 2019, the UK government established an Office for Veterans’ Affairs which was jointly run by the Cabinet Office Minister for Defence People and Veterans and the Minister for Cabinet Office and Paymaster General. The two ministers share responsibility for veterans’ affairs. While the Office for Veterans’ Affairs supports all UK veterans through employment, health and economic benefits, it does not have a designated office to support UK’s women veterans. 

A report published by Cranfield University and Institute for Employment Studies in 2019, found that women veterans have a lower employment rate (69%) compared to their male counterparts (81%). 

Most women veterans in the UK do not receive pension and as a result are pushed into homelessness. Until the 1990’s women were forced to leave the Services if they got pregnant and were not eligible for pension if they did not complete a full service of 22 years for soldiers and 16 years for officers. 

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the international concept of the responsibility to protect. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%

Resources
  1. Female veterans face more barriers to employment than male veterans,” FIMT, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  2. Female army veterans pushed into homelessness and destitution by ‘absymal’ pension rules,”Independent, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  3. Supporting and Empowering Women Veterans,” NCVO 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  4. Female Veterans Support Serving Personnel and Other Veterans Alike,” The Confederation of Service Charities, 2020. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  5. Charity calls on ministers to support female veterans,” KCW London, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  6. PM creates new Office for Veterans’ Affairs to provide lifelong support to military personnel,” UK Government, 2019. Accessed 21 September 2020. 

 

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Sexual Violence

CriteriaDedicated programmes for survivors of sexual violence should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 provides the following services:
National crisis hotline
Women's shelters
Women's rape crisis centres
Counseling services
National sex-offender list or website
Support groups for victims/survivors
Comment

In 2018-19, Rape Crisis Centres provided 7,32,184 sessions of specialist support which included advocacy, emotional support and counselling (a 9% increase from 2017-18). The Rape Crisis Centers (for which Rape Crisis serves as an umbrella body) handled 186,243 online and telephone helpline contacts ( twice the number of text messages than in 2017-18).

In 2019, rape and sexual abuse support services were awarded increased government funding to help more victims- totalling  £24m over 3 years.

 

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the CEDAW, Istanbul Convention and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
6 - 100%
5 - 83%
4 - 66%
3 - 49%
2 - 32%
1 - 15%
0 - 0%.
Resources
  1. Rape Crisis Statistics,” Rape Crisis England and Wales. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  2. Funding boost for victims of rape and sexual abuse,” Ministry of Justice, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020.

  3. Rape crisis calls for sustainable funding for specialist services,Rape Crisis England and Wales. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  4. "UK National Strategy on Violence Against Women 2016-2020," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2016. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

 

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Human Trafficking

CriteriaDedicated programmes for urvivors of human trafficking should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 provides the following services:
Human trafficking hotline
Human trafficking shelter
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.)
Health services
Legal services
Job training programmes
Educational services
Comment

In June 2019, there were over 1,479 active law enforcement investigations, compared with 188  in November 2016. In 2019, the UK Government announced it would invest £10 million to establish a new Modern Slavery Policy and Evidence Centre to transform the understanding of modern slavery. 

The National Referral Mechanism (NRM) is a framework to identify victims of human trafficking or modern slavery and ensure that they receive the required support. Through the NRM, authorities referred 10,627 potential trafficking victims for care nationwide in 2019, a 52 percent increase from 6,993 in 2018. 

The UK government provided $ 26.39 million to an NGO through 2020 to coordinate the provision of care for adult victims in England and Wales under the NRM. 

 

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with Palermo Protocol and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources
  1. 2020 Trafficking in Person Report,” The United States Department of State, 2020. Accessed September 7, 2020. [Full report]

  2. "2019 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2019. Accessed September 7, 2020. [Full report]

  3. "Annual Report 2019," Modern Day Slavery, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  4. Report Human Trafficking,” Citizens Advice, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

 

 

 

 

100.0%
Implementation Dedicated Programmes to Support Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

CriteriaDedicated programmes for refugees, asylum seekers, and IDPs should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2019 provides the following services:
State refugee/IDP strategy exists
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.) are provided
Health services are available
Legal services are available
Job training programmes are available
Educational services are available
Community engagement/integration programmes are available
Comment

In 2019, the UK received 35,099 asylum applications (11% more than the previous year). The UK offered protection, in the form of humanitarian protection, asylum, alternative forms of resettlement, to 20,339 people (17% higher than the previous year). 

The Vulnerable Person Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) accounted for 4,030 (over three-quarters)  of those resettled in the UK in 2019. 

Iran was the top nationality claiming asylum in the UK in 2019 with 4,741 applications (up by 22% from the previous year), followed by Albania with 3,467 applications (up by 40% from the previous year). 

However, the UK Border Force has also stepped up attacks on asylum seekers and refugees by illegally detaining them under Home Office guidance and Dublin III regulation. In 2019, the number of migrants attempting to cross the English Channel increased significantly from previous years. For instance, on a single day in September 2019, a record 86 migrants crossed the Channel. However, the UK government has failed to adequately recognize the right to seek asylum of these migrants. 

 

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) recommendations. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources
  1. How many people do we grant asylum or protection to?, UK Government, 2020. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  2. "Asylum in the UK," The United Nations Refugee Agency, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  3. Migration to the UK: Asylum and Resettled Refugees,” The Migration Observatory, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2020. 

  4. Migrants crossing the English Channel,” House of Commons Library, 2019. Accessed November 18, 2020.